Open Stack

On Oct 31, 2016 1:13 PM, "Jesse Keating" <omgjlk at us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> This has been my experience as well. I purposefully attend the project
fishbowl sessions and often the project mid cycles to be able to provide
real time operator feedback as future plans are discussed and
retrospectives from the previous release are held.

Right but the point is thise fishbowl won't be held at the PTG as I
understand it. It's more like Friday at the Design Summit. Those fishbowl
type sessions are meant to occur at the Forum.

>
> Given a choice between attending either the Ops mid cycle or the PTG, I
see far more value in the PTG, which will be held at a very similar time.
> -jlk
>
>
Maybe you should ask over in the dev list and see if that would be at all
appreciated or useful. I'd be interested in their perspective.

-Erik
>>
>> ----- Original message -----
>> From: Matthias Runge <mrunge at redhat.com>
>> To: openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> Cc:
>> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] 2017 Openstack Operators Mid-Cycle
Meetups - venue selection etherpads
>> Date: Thu, Oct 27, 2016 5:33 AM
>>
>> On 27/10/16 11:08, Erik McCormick wrote:
>> > The PTG is for devs to get together and get real work done. We would be
>> > a distraction from that goal. They will also be attending the forum
>> > which will run with the summits and will be able to spend more time in
>> > groups with ops for requirements gathering and such.
>> >
>> > -Erik
>> >
>> >
>> > On Oct 27, 2016 11:05 AM, "Jesse Keating" <omgjlk at us.ibm.com
>> > <mailto:omgjlk at us.ibm.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     I may have missed something, but why aren't we meeting at the
>> >     Project Technical Gathering, which is at the end of February in
Atlanta?
>>
>> From my experience with OpenStack, feedback from operators have been
>> invaluable.
>>
>> You can easily run things in devstack (or all-in-one deployments), but
>> this is completely different from running in scale. Operators do tell
>> you, were the pain-points are. Having a dedicated gathering without
>> involving actual operators/users is not that useful IMO.
>>
>> Matthias
>> --
>> Matthias Runge <mrunge at redhat.com>
>>
>> Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/, Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
>> Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
>> Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham,
>>                     Michael O'Neill, Eric Shander
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20161101/58c0de55/attachment.html>