[Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [glance] Proposal for a mid-cycle virtual sync on operator issues

Nikhil Komawar nik.komawar at gmail.com
Tue May 31 21:13:24 UTC 2016


Hey,


Thanks for your interest.

Sorry about the confusion. Please consider the same time for Thursday
June 9th.


Thur June 9th proposed time:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2016&month=6&day=9&hour=11&min=0&sec=0&p1=881&p2=196&p3=47&p4=22&p5=157&p6=87&p7=24&p8=78&p9=283


Alternate time proposal:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2016&month=6&day=9&hour=23&min=0&sec=0&p1=881&p2=196&p3=47&p4=22&p5=157&p6=87&p7=24&p8=78&p9=283


Overall time planner:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=20160609&p1=881&p2=196&p3=47&p4=22&p5=157&p6=87&p7=24&p8=78&p9=283



It will really depend on who is strongly interested in the discussions.
Scheduling with EMEA, Pacific time (US), Australian (esp. Eastern) is
quite difficult. If there's strong interest from San Jose, we may have
to settle for a rather awkward choice below:


http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2016&month=6&day=9&hour=4&min=0&sec=0&p1=881&p2=196&p3=47&p4=22&p5=157&p6=87&p7=24&p8=78&p9=283



A vote of +1, 0, -1 on these times would help long way.


On 5/31/16 4:35 PM, Belmiro Moreira wrote:
> Hi Nikhil,
> I'm interested in this discussion.
>
> Initially you were proposing Thursday June 9th, 2016 at 2000UTC.
> Are you suggesting to change also the date? Because in the new
> timeanddate suggestions is 6/7 of June.
>
> Belmiro
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Nikhil Komawar <nik.komawar at gmail.com
> <mailto:nik.komawar at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hey,
>
>
>
>
>
>     Thanks for the feedback. 0800UTC is 4am EDT for some of the US
>     Glancers :-)
>
>
>
>
>
>     I request this time which may help the folks in Eastern and Central US
>
>     time.
>
>     http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2016&month=6&day=7&hour=11&min=0&sec=0&p1=881&p2=196&p3=47&p4=22&p5=157&p6=87&p7=24&p8=78
>
>
>
>
>
>     If it still does not work, I may have to poll the folks in EMEA on how
>
>     strong their intentions are for joining this call.  Because
>     another time
>
>     slot that works for folks in Australia & US might be too inconvenient
>
>     for those in EMEA:
>
>     http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2016&month=6&day=6&hour=23&min=0&sec=0&p1=881&p2=196&p3=47&p4=22&p5=157&p6=87&p7=24&p8=78
>
>
>
>
>
>     Here's the map of cities that may be involved:
>
>     http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=20160607&p1=881&p2=196&p3=47&p4=22&p5=157&p7=87&p8=24&p9=78
>
>
>
>
>
>     Please let me know which ones are possible and we can try to work
>     around
>
>     the times.
>
>
>
>
>
>     On 5/31/16 2:54 AM, Blair Bethwaite wrote:
>
>     > Hi Nikhil,
>
>     >
>
>     > 2000UTC might catch a few kiwis, but it's 6am everywhere on the east
>
>     > coast of Australia, and even earlier out west. 0800UTC, on the other
>
>     > hand, would be more sociable.
>
>     >
>
>     > On 26 May 2016 at 15:30, Nikhil Komawar <nik.komawar at gmail.com
>     <mailto:nik.komawar at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     >> Thanks Sam. We purposefully chose that time to accommodate some
>     of our
>
>     >> community members from the Pacific. I'm assuming it's just your
>     case
>
>     >> that's not working out for that time? So, hopefully other
>     Australian/NZ
>
>     >> friends can join.
>
>     >>
>
>     >>
>
>     >> On 5/26/16 12:59 AM, Sam Morrison wrote:
>
>     >>> I’m hoping some people from the Large Deployment Team can come
>     along. It’s not a good time for me in Australia but hoping someone
>     else can join in.
>
>     >>>
>
>     >>> Sam
>
>     >>>
>
>     >>>
>
>     >>>> On 26 May 2016, at 2:16 AM, Nikhil Komawar
>     <nik.komawar at gmail.com <mailto:nik.komawar at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     >>>>
>
>     >>>> Hello,
>
>     >>>>
>
>     >>>>
>
>     >>>> Firstly, I would like to thank Fei Long for bringing up a few
>     operator
>
>     >>>> centric issues to the Glance team. After chatting with him on
>     IRC, we
>
>     >>>> realized that there may be more operators who would want to
>     contribute
>
>     >>>> to the discussions to help us take some informed decisions.
>
>     >>>>
>
>     >>>>
>
>     >>>> So, I would like to call for a 2 hour sync for the Glance
>     team along
>
>     >>>> with interested operators on Thursday June 9th, 2016 at 2000UTC.
>
>     >>>>
>
>     >>>>
>
>     >>>> If you are interested in participating please RSVP here [1], and
>
>     >>>> participate in the poll for the tool you'd prefer. I've also
>     added a
>
>     >>>> section for Topics and provided a template to document the
>     issues clearly.
>
>     >>>>
>
>     >>>>
>
>     >>>> Please be mindful of everyone's time and if you are proposing
>     issue(s)
>
>     >>>> to be discussed, come prepared with well documented &
>     referenced topic(s).
>
>     >>>>
>
>     >>>>
>
>     >>>> If you've feedback that you are not sure if appropriate for the
>
>     >>>> etherpad, you can reach me on irc (nick: nikhil).
>
>     >>>>
>
>     >>>>
>
>     >>>> [1]
>     https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-glance-and-ops-midcycle-sync
>
>     >>>>
>
>     >>>> --
>
>     >>>>
>
>     >>>> Thanks,
>
>     >>>> Nikhil Komawar
>
>     >>>> Newton PTL for OpenStack Glance
>
>     >>>>
>
>     >>>>
>
>     >>>>
>     __________________________________________________________________________
>
>     >>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
>     >>>> Unsubscribe:
>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>     <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>
>     >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>     >>>
>     __________________________________________________________________________
>
>     >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
>     >>> Unsubscribe:
>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>     <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>
>     >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>     >> --
>
>     >>
>
>     >> Thanks,
>
>     >> Nikhil
>
>     >>
>
>     >>
>
>     >> _______________________________________________
>
>     >> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>
>     >> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
>
>     >>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>     >
>
>     >
>
>
>
>     --
>
>
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Nikhil
>
>
>
>
>
>     __________________________________________________________________________
>
>     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
>     Unsubscribe:
>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>     <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 

Thanks,
Nikhil





More information about the OpenStack-operators mailing list