[Openstack-operators] [craton] Versions of Python to support for Craton

Jim Baker jim.baker at python.org
Wed May 25 17:27:26 UTC 2016


Sean, thanks for your help here, it's very much appreciated!

The move then should be straightforward once we get past our first
milestone, on or around June 10; but any prep in advance sounds good.



On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:37 PM, sean roberts <seanroberts66 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Now that we have settled on the name, setting up the project
> infrastructure is straightforward. I have done this a few times and am
> ready to do it for craton.
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Jim Baker <jim.baker at python.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Sam Morrison <sorrison at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I’m in favour of using 3.5. We are in the process of moving things to
>>> ubuntu xenial and 3.5 is native there.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback!
>>
>>
>>>
>>> BTW when is Craton planning on getting into openstack gerrit etc?
>>>
>>
>> The specific timeline of the move to gerrit is not something we have
>> actively discussed, because of the usual: we are trying to complete our
>> phase 1 milestone. Currently we are projecting June 10 (based on Monte
>> Carlo modeling), but this could slip. In any event, once we finish
>> milestone 1, moving to OpenStack Gerrit and infrastructure in general ASAP
>> would make sense.
>>
>> In other words, it should be quite soon!
>>
>> - Jim
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> ~ sean
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20160525/c158b3fa/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-operators mailing list