The projects themselves don't seems updated, there are other projects in the big-tent that are not listed there yet. On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote: > > Looking at projects like Barbican in the > https://www.openstack.org/software/releases/liberty/components/barbican, > they seem to have met some conditions which are currently marked as ‘no’. > > What is the mechanism to query these settings (either manual or automatic) > ? > > As an example, there is significant documentation for Barbican at > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/barbican/ but it is marked as ‘no’ in > the page for > https://www.openstack.org/software/releases/liberty/components/barbican Is > there an install guide for this project guide (at docs.openstack.org)? > > How about adding > > - some algorithmic description (i.e. automatic or manual) for the > selection ? If automatic, the algorithm could be provided so the project > knows what to do > - a process description for the manual cases for projects to ask for a > re-classification > > Tim > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > > -- Best Regards , The G. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20160323/b7b4455a/attachment.html>