Added a bug task for the Kilo UCA - this should be picked up in the next round of kilo updates for the UCA. On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 at 08:35 Matt Jarvis <matt.jarvis at datacentred.co.uk> wrote: > This thread is a great example of the value of the midcycle meetups :) > > On 4 March 2016 at 08:09, Saverio Proto <zioproto at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks for merging the patch so quickly ! I will try today to build >> new ubuntu packages and and for feedback at UCA. >> >> > But yes, thank you for pointing this out. Bug fixes are mostly >> > backported to Liberty release, in some rare cases Kilo might get a fix >> > as well. >> >> This is an endless discussion :) >> But please look here at page 20: >> https://www.openstack.org/assets/survey/Public-User-Survey-Report.pdf >> >> Most production systems are on old releases. >> Kilo is not that old ! And I am really curious to see the results of >> the next Survey. >> We would like to avoid to have each installation with custom packages. >> >> I think this email thread was a good example on how we can improve >> operators to developers feedback to have better stable branches. >> Operators should not be afraid of proposing a cherry-pick to stable >> branch, especially if it fixes a non-corner case problem, and if it >> easy to review. >> >> my 2 cents :) >> >> Cheers, >> >> Saverio >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> > > > DataCentred Limited registered in England and Wales no. 05611763 > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20160304/f2200ac9/attachment.html>