Open Stack

I agree with the list of contributions that should garner value, and I
really like TOC, because some folks who meet the other operators
requirements may not actually _run_ OpenStack, they may "operate" on top :)



On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com>
wrote:

> Hello Folks,
>
> I have to admit that I really like these two:
>
> TOC / Technical Ops Contributor
> IRO / I Run OpenStack
>
> Edgar
>
> From: Pierre Freund <pierre.freund at osones.com>
> Date: Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 6:57 AM
> To: Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com>
> Cc: "openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org" <
> openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>, "community at lists.openstack.org"
> <community at lists.openstack.org>, "Jonathan D. Proulx" <jon at csail.mit.edu>,
> Shilla Saebi <shilla.saebi at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-community] Recognising Ops contributions
>
> *This needs a catchy name.*
>> Yes, yes it does. Suggestions?
>>
> ​​
> Some suggestions, but I'm not a native english speaker, it might sounds
> not natural.
>
> AOC / Active Ops Contributor
> ACC / Active Community Contributor
> TOC / Technical Ops Contributor
> Proud Ops
> POP / Proudly Operating in Production
> IRO / I Run OpenStack
>
> --
> Pierre F
> ​reund​
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20160303/c2c931c4/attachment.html>