Open Stack

We've done the opposite, newer Keystone with older code. No issues that
we've seen.

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Kevin Bringard (kevinbri) <
kevinbri at cisco.com> wrote:

> We've even done later versions of keystone with older versions of other
> stuff (Specifically Kilo Keystone with Juno Glance/Heat and Icehouse
> everything else)...
>
> The thing I'd watch out for going the other direction is if the newer
> version of, let's say, nova, requires API calls which aren't present in
> your older version of Keystone. I can't think of any specific calls off the
> top of my head, but that'd be the only major read flag which comes to mind.
>
>
>
> On 1/5/16, 10:50 PM, "Abel Lopez" <alopgeek at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >We've done things like Icehouse keystone and Juno glance/heat/ceilometer.
> >
> >
> >Seems like having older keystone is somewhat safe.
> >
> >On Tuesday, January 5, 2016, Marcus Furlong <furlongm at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >Just wanted to check if it's possible to have a mixed version
> >environment with kilo keystone and e.g. liberty nova.
> >
> >Has anyone done this? Any gotchas?
> >
> >Regards,
> >Marcus.
> >--
> >Marcus Furlong
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >OpenStack-operators mailing list
> >OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org <javascript:;>
> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20160106/4889f96c/attachment.html>