[Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [all] A proposal to separate the design summit

Matt Fischer matt at mattfischer.com
Mon Feb 22 16:32:41 UTC 2016

Cross-post to openstack-operators...

As an operator, there's value in me attending some of the design summit
sessions to provide feedback and guidance. But I don't really need to be in
the room for a week discussing minutiae of implementations. So I probably
can't justify 2 extra trips just to give a few hours of
feedback/discussion. If this is indeed the case for some other folks we'll
need to do a good job of collecting operator feedback at the operator
sessions (perhaps hopefully with reps from each major project?). We don't
want projects operating in a vacuum when it comes to major decisions.

Also where do the current operators design sessions and operators midcycle
fit in here?

(apologies for not replying directly to the first message, gmail seems to
have lost it).

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Russell Bryant <rbryant at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>
> wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>> TL;DR: Let's split the events, starting after Barcelona.
> This proposal sounds fantastic.  Thank you very much to those that help
> put it together.
> --
> Russell Bryant
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20160222/fb147e26/attachment.html>

More information about the OpenStack-operators mailing list