Open Stack

I'm not following. There's a paid-for / enterprise version of Contrail from
Juniper:

http://www.juniper.net/us/en/products-services/sdn/contrail/

So I think two separate entries are valid.

On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com>
wrote:

> No, that is not the case. There is not Enterprise version of OpenContrail.
> Therefore, this question could split the responses because it is confusing.
>
> Edgar
>
> From: Joe Topjian <joe at topjian.net>
> Date: Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 8:17 AM
> To: Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com>
> Cc: Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org>, "openstack at lists.openstack.org" <
> openstack at lists.openstack.org>, OpenStack Operators <
> openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>, "community at lists.openstack.org"
> <community at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] User Survey - Deadline Feb 24th
>
> Isn't it similar to asking if you use Fedora, CentOS, or RHEL?
>
> My understanding is that Juniper offers a paid/supported version of
> Contrail while OpenContrail is the open source version.
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Tom,
>>
>> For the "Which OpenStack Network (Neutron) drivers are you using?”
>> section.
>>
>> What is the difference between using Juniper and OpenContrail?. There
>> should be only OpenContrail or something like OpenContrail/Juniper.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Edgar
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/9/16, 1:33 AM, "Tom Fifield" <tom at openstack.org> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi all,
>> >
>> >If you run OpenStack, build apps on it, or have customers with OpenStack
>> >deployments, please take a few minutes to respond to the latest User
>> >Survey or pass it along to your friends.
>> >
>> >Since 2013, the user survey has provided significant insight into what
>> >people are deploying and how they're using OpenStack. You can see the
>> >most recent results in the October 2015 report[1].
>> >
>> >
>> >Please follow the link and instructions below to complete the User
>> >Survey by ***February 24, 2016 at 23:00 UTC***. If you already completed
>> >the survey, there's no need to start over. You can simply log back in to
>> >update your Deployment Profile, as well as take the opportunity to
>> >provide additional input. You need to do this to keep your past survey
>> >responses active, but we hope you'll do it because we've made the survey
>> >shorter and with more interesting questions ;)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Take the Survey ( http://www.openstack.org/user-survey )
>> >
>> >
>> >All of the information you provide is confidential to the Foundation and
>> >User Committee and will be aggregated anonymously unless you clearly
>> >indicate we can publish your organization’s profile.
>> >
>> >Remember you can hear directly from users and see the aggregate survey
>> >findings by attending the next OpenStack Summit, April 25-29 in Austin
>> >(http://www.openstack.org/summit).
>> >
>> >Thank you again for your support.
>> >
>> >
>> >-Tom
>> >
>> >PS, an RT of https://twitter.com/OpenStack/status/695751431542874112
>> >helps too :)
>> >
>> >[1]
>> >
>> https://www.openstack.org/user-survey/survey-2016-q1/landing?BackURL=%2Fuser-survey%2Fsurvey-2016-q1%2F
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> >OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20160209/5a364ea0/attachment.html>