[Openstack-operators] New networking solution for Cloud Native apps....
Chris Marino
chris at romana.io
Fri Feb 5 14:42:25 UTC 2016
Hi Jay, yes we do.
Besides the obvious ML2 driver, we've probably done more with the new IPAM
API than anyone. We submitted a proposal for the Summit to talk about our
experiences.
Also, we want Romana to work on whatever underlay OpenStack is running and
that's going to require further work so that the various ML2 drivers
peacefully co-exist.
We're also working on integration with container management systems to
avoid the double encap problem that they have when running on OpenStack.
None of them have a great tenancy model and this is where OpenStack can
really help.
CM
ᐧ
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 02/05/2016 08:17 AM, Chris Marino wrote:
>
>> Hi Tomas, functionally, that is pretty accurate, but operationally they
>> are quite different. All the L3 approaches have fundamentally the same
>> point of view. I'd add OpenContrail and Nuage and what CloudScaling did
>> to the list of similar approaches as well.
>>
>> More info here if you interested.
>>
>>
>> http://romana.io/faq/#how-is-romana-different-from-other-layer-3-based-sdn-solutions
>>
>
> Do you and your team have plans to contribute to the core of Neutron and
> further the good of the Neutron contributor community outside of your
> Romana product?
>
> Best,
> -jay
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20160205/6ccaa1cb/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-operators
mailing list