[Openstack-operators] Mid-Cycle Meetup, NYC, August 25th, call for additional working group sessions
Chris Morgan
mihalis68 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 11 19:15:42 UTC 2016
I have no problem with this and we could move Trove to run alongside Large
Deployments at 3.20pm on day 1. However Trove isn't something we are
interested in where I work. Anyone relying on talking or hearing about
Trove in the current slot? (1.30pm day 2)
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Amrith Kumar <amrith at tesora.com> wrote:
> Hi, I’d definitely like to attend the Trove session. Would it be possible
> to advance it to the morning (pre-lunch) on Friday, or Thursday please.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> -amrith
>
>
>
> *From:* Chris Morgan [mailto:mihalis68 at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 09, 2016 4:38 PM
> *To:* Matt Fischer <matt at mattfischer.com>
> *Cc:* OpenStack Operators <OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Openstack-operators] Mid-Cycle Meetup, NYC, August 25th,
> call for additional working group sessions
>
>
>
> ok so for now I remove database cleanup and added Sean Dague/Nova to that
> slot
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Chris Morgan <mihalis68 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yeah we dropped that in but colored it orange meaning not many +1s and
> quite a narrow topic in context
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Matt Fischer <matt at mattfischer.com> wrote:
>
> I didn't see any plus ones on my idea for the db cleanup session so if we
> need to drop it to fit something that works for me.
>
>
>
> On Aug 9, 2016 12:29 PM, "Chris Morgan" <mihalis68 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> WG6, day one? That's 40 minutes. Would run alongside Large Deployment.
> Currently that has the main room. Would nova be more universal to operators?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org> wrote:
>
> Good news! Sean Dague is coming to the event and has volunteered to lead a
> session on behalf of the nova team.
>
> They're going to work on a list of questions that nova would like to ask
> nova ops and also keep it open for general feedback.
>
> Let's find a slot?
>
>
>
> On 廿十六年八月八日 暮 02:18, Chris Morgan wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone,
> The itinerary for the meet up is starting to come together nicely. We
> have landed the general sessions on the main stage fairly well I feel.
> However, we can fit more working group proposals into the venue but need
> some more topics.
>
> The etherpad for suggestions is here :
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/NYC-ops-meetup
>
> and the current state of the itinerary is here
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1EUSYMs3GfglnD8yfFaAXWhLe0F5y9
> hCUKqCYe0Vp1oA/edit?pref=2&pli=1#gid=1046944156
>
> Please contribute by adding topics and/or +1ing existing topics. This
> itinerary will be discussed in the IRC meeting tomorrow, which I believe
> Tom will be sending out his handy reminder for soon.
>
> Chris
>
> --
>
> Chris Morgan <mihalis68 at gmail.com <mailto:mihalis68 at gmail.com>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Chris Morgan <mihalis68 at gmail.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Chris Morgan <mihalis68 at gmail.com>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Chris Morgan <mihalis68 at gmail.com>
>
--
Chris Morgan <mihalis68 at gmail.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20160811/49a42881/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-operators
mailing list