[Openstack-operators] Help

Patricia Dugan patricia.dugan at oneops.com
Tue Aug 9 13:16:18 UTC 2016



sent from the road 

> On Aug 9, 2016, at 5:00 AM, openstack-operators-request at lists.openstack.org wrote:
> 
> Send OpenStack-operators mailing list submissions to
>    openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
> 
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    openstack-operators-request at lists.openstack.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    openstack-operators-owner at lists.openstack.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of OpenStack-operators digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: migration leaves instance in VERIFY_RESIZE and does not
>      clean up source host resources (Gustavo Randich)
>   2. Re: [nova] can we lock RPC version with    upgrade_levels on
>      neutron-openvswitch-agent ? (Ihar Hrachyshka)
>   3. Re: [nova] can we lock RPC version with upgrade_levels on
>      neutron-openvswitch-agent ? (Micha? Jastrz?bski)
>   4. Ops Meetups Team - Next Meeting Coordinates    and News (Tom Fifield)
>   5. Re: Ops Meetups Team - Next Meeting    Coordinates and News
>      (Tom Fifield)
>   6. Re: Ops Meetups Team - Next Meeting Coordinates and News
>      (Melvin Hillsman)
>   7. Re: VirtIO and IDE disk (Emilio Moreno Fernandez)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 18:31:21 -0300
> From: Gustavo Randich <gustavo.randich at gmail.com>
> To: "openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org"
>    <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] migration leaves instance in
>    VERIFY_RESIZE and does not clean up source host resources
> Message-ID:
>    <CABUq5YWXw_MsygeU6fXxgHz+-OkJaJHEN_eCFkMuiR1aRbgjrA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Sorry, I forgot to run 'nova resize-confirm'....
> 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Gustavo Randich <gustavo.randich at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi folks,
>> 
>> I'm using Mitaka, and when running "nova migrate <instance-uuid>", once
>> the instance is migrated OK to other host, it remains forever in
>> VERIFY_RESIZE status (not ACTIVE). There are no errors in the log.
>> 
>> Also, in the source host, the directory /var/lib/nova/instances/<instance-uuid>_resize
>> is left with disk, disk.info files, etc. in it, and the virsh domain
>> remains defined (but in shut off state).
>> 
>> Is all this expected?
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Gustavo
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20160808/c75e2be3/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 00:02:14 +0200
> From: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys at redhat.com>
> To: Micha? Jastrz?bski <inc007 at gmail.com>
> Cc: OpenStack Operators <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] can we lock RPC version with
>    upgrade_levels on neutron-openvswitch-agent ?
> Message-ID: <65705CAC-D022-4C3A-B0E5-76E4BA4B2674 at redhat.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; delsp=yes; format=flowed
> 
> (Adding back ops@)
> 
> Micha? Jastrz?bski <inc007 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Yes, but it's a bit different. Difference being if you're doing it
>> right, you can keep nova running during upgrade. Can't say the same
>> for neutron.
> 
> There is ongoing work to make it possible. The way it looks now, it will  
> take Ocata the least. Till that happy time, you should indeed all  
> controllers before upgrading database.
> 
> That said, you can still run your agents while you upgrade your controller  
> nodes. Once you are done with controllers, you can upgrade one remaining  
> node running agents at a time.
> 
> Ihar
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:06:34 -0500
> From: Micha? Jastrz?bski <inc007 at gmail.com>
> To: Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys at redhat.com>
> Cc: OpenStack Operators <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] can we lock RPC version with
>    upgrade_levels on neutron-openvswitch-agent ?
> Message-ID:
>    <CALc0zUD1KoA5D4Vtzf+oLr-UpDkiNXjtEEFLRk5u0foGidFWOQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> Yes, that's true, and that's what we're doing really. Our order of
> upgrade is q-srv -> q-ovs-agent -> q-dhcp and rest. If that causes
> issues, please submit bug for it. We should address that in our
> playbooks.
> 
>> On 8 August 2016 at 17:02, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys at redhat.com> wrote:
>> (Adding back ops@)
>> 
>> Micha? Jastrz?bski <inc007 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Yes, but it's a bit different. Difference being if you're doing it
>>> right, you can keep nova running during upgrade. Can't say the same
>>> for neutron.
>> 
>> 
>> There is ongoing work to make it possible. The way it looks now, it will
>> take Ocata the least. Till that happy time, you should indeed all
>> controllers before upgrading database.
>> 
>> That said, you can still run your agents while you upgrade your controller
>> nodes. Once you are done with controllers, you can upgrade one remaining
>> node running agents at a time.
>> 
>> Ihar
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 15:45:36 -0700
> From: Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org>
> To: OpenStack Operators <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: [Openstack-operators] Ops Meetups Team - Next Meeting
>    Coordinates    and News
> Message-ID: <a8973f82-6251-1956-222b-1497ec80b61b at openstack.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> 
> Ops Meetups Team,
> 
> Cheers for your great work in the last meeting. We had some fantastic 
> discussion, and a special guest appearance from Allison Price. The 
> meeting overview can be found at [3]).
> 
> 
> ==Next Meeting==
> Unless there is further discussion, this the next meeting is at:
> 
> ==> Tuesday, 8 of Aug at 1400 UTC[1] in #openstack-operators
> 
> [2] will be kept up to date with information about the meeting time and 
> agenda
> 
> 
> ==August Meetup==
> NYC is tracking well. We have 83 registered so far, and have been 
> working on the agenda - expect to discuss that at this meeting and get a 
> draft on the ops ML ASAP. Then the process of finding moderators will start.
> 
> We still need a sponsor for our evening event. Multiple companies 
> chipping in together would be ideal. See the email from Melvin:
> 
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2016-August/011153.html
> 
> 
> 
> ==Meetup promotion==
> We had a great discussion on meetup promotion and confirmed the list of 
> tasks we plan to do to promote the meetups appropriately to ensure we 
> get new people coming and also make sure they're cloud ops. See 
> Allison's summary here:
> 
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2016-August/011152.html
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> [1] 
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Ops+Meetups+Team&iso=20160808T22&p1=241
> 
> [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ops_Meetups_Team#Meeting_Information
> 
> [3] 
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ops_meetups_team/2016/ops_meetups_team.2016-08-02-14.00.html
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 15:46:48 -0700
> From: Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org>
> To: OpenStack Operators <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Meetups Team - Next Meeting
>    Coordinates and News
> Message-ID: <fb4ffd14-1347-d8a9-a862-2159e779361e at openstack.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> 
> As usual, I have messed up the date. Email updated below with correct 
> information.
> 
>> On ???????? ? 03:45, Tom Fifield wrote:
>> Ops Meetups Team,
>> 
>> Cheers for your great work in the last meeting. We had some fantastic
>> discussion, and a special guest appearance from Allison Price. The
>> meeting overview can be found at [3]).
>> 
>> 
>> ==Next Meeting==
>> Unless there is further discussion, this the next meeting is at:
>> 
>> ==> Tuesday, 9 of Aug at 1400 UTC[1] in #openstack-operators
>> 
>> [2] will be kept up to date with information about the meeting time and
>> agenda
>> 
>> 
>> ==August Meetup==
>> NYC is tracking well. We have 83 registered so far, and have been
>> working on the agenda - expect to discuss that at this meeting and get a
>> draft on the ops ML ASAP. Then the process of finding moderators will
>> start.
>> 
>> We still need a sponsor for our evening event. Multiple companies
>> chipping in together would be ideal. See the email from Melvin:
>> 
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2016-August/011153.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ==Meetup promotion==
>> We had a great discussion on meetup promotion and confirmed the list of
>> tasks we plan to do to promote the meetups appropriately to ensure we
>> get new people coming and also make sure they're cloud ops. See
>> Allison's summary here:
>> 
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2016-August/011152.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> 
>> Tom
>> 
>> 
>> [1]
>> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Ops+Meetups+Team&iso=20160809T22&p1=241
>> 
>> 
>> [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ops_Meetups_Team#Meeting_Information
>> 
>> [3]
>> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ops_meetups_team/2016/ops_meetups_team.2016-08-02-14.00.html
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 17:49:48 -0500
> From: Melvin Hillsman <mrhillsman at gmail.com>
> To: Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org>, OpenStack Operators
>    <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Meetups Team - Next Meeting
>    Coordinates and News
> Message-ID: <50A51BA2-ADD9-4680-8851-3BB9C49F19DD at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="UTF-8"
> 
> I beg to differ, it is not you, but the date that messed up! :P all is forgiven.
> 
> Kind regards,
> --
> Melvin Hillsman
> Ops Technical Lead
> OpenStack Innovation Center
> mrhillsman at gmail.com
> phone: (210) 312-1267
> mobile: (210) 413-1659
> Learner | Ideation | Belief | Responsibility | Command
> http://osic.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 8/8/16, 5:46 PM, "Tom Fifield" <tom at openstack.org> wrote:
>> 
>> As usual, I have messed up the date. Email updated below with correct 
>> information.
>> 
>>> On ???????? ? 03:45, Tom Fifield wrote:
>>> Ops Meetups Team,
>>> 
>>> Cheers for your great work in the last meeting. We had some fantastic
>>> discussion, and a special guest appearance from Allison Price. The
>>> meeting overview can be found at [3]).
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ==Next Meeting==
>>> Unless there is further discussion, this the next meeting is at:
>>> 
>>> ==> Tuesday, 9 of Aug at 1400 UTC[1] in #openstack-operators
>>> 
>>> [2] will be kept up to date with information about the meeting time and
>>> agenda
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ==August Meetup==
>>> NYC is tracking well. We have 83 registered so far, and have been
>>> working on the agenda - expect to discuss that at this meeting and get a
>>> draft on the ops ML ASAP. Then the process of finding moderators will
>>> start.
>>> 
>>> We still need a sponsor for our evening event. Multiple companies
>>> chipping in together would be ideal. See the email from Melvin:
>>> 
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2016-August/011153.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ==Meetup promotion==
>>> We had a great discussion on meetup promotion and confirmed the list of
>>> tasks we plan to do to promote the meetups appropriately to ensure we
>>> get new people coming and also make sure they're cloud ops. See
>>> Allison's summary here:
>>> 
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2016-August/011152.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Tom
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [1]
>>> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Ops+Meetups+Team&iso=20160809T22&p1=241
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ops_Meetups_Team#Meeting_Information
>>> 
>>> [3]
>>> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ops_meetups_team/2016/ops_meetups_team.2016-08-02-14.00.html
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 09:19:58 +0000
> From: Emilio Moreno Fernandez <emilio.moreno at adam.es>
> To: 'Pouliot.net' <peter at pouliot.net>
> Cc: "'openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org'"
>    <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] VirtIO and IDE disk
> Message-ID:
>    <C39765207701584089064291281A1D9AED3F5A11 at exch01.adam.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> Drivers are correct for Windows 2012 R2, if I install one server with 2012 ISO disk and VirtIO ISO to volume. All it?s ok!
> But...if I receive one vmdk image, I convert it to raw and launch it with ide bus on hda...but i want lauch it with virtio bus.
> 
> Boot the instance...install virtio driver for Windows 2012 R2 of last ISO from fedora like ?legacy hardware? and shutoff...at the next boot...BSOD of Windows 2012.
> 
> This process it?s ok with Windows 2008 R2, Windows XP, Windows 2003, Windows 7 and Windows 8.
> 
> 
> One solution is launch volume in my PC with KVM local install, I can launch instance with two volumes, first IDE hda volume with system and second volume like vdc VirtIO. When I boot system, I can install drivers for second VirtIO volume and then I can launch system volume like VirtIO VDA without problems. I think that Windows install driver correctly with virtio volume attached.
> 
> 
> Finally, I want to launch one instance in Openstack JUNO, with two volumes, one IDE HDA and second VirtIO like vdc for example. I can?t launch instance like this, this is my last option because manually install of drivers on Windows 2012 installed and migrated fail.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Emilio Moreno Fern?ndez
> Departamento de Sistemas
> 
> c/ Artesans, 7 - Parc Tecnol?gic del Vall?s
> 08290 Cerdanyola del Vall?s - Barcelona
> 
> Tel.  902 902 685
> E-mail. emilio.moreno at adam.es
> www.adam.es<http://www.adam.es/>
> 
> [adam_linkedin]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/adam-tic> LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/adam-tic>  |   [adam_twitter] <https://twitter.com/adam_tic>  @Adam_TIC<https://twitter.com/adam_tic>
> 
> 
> [adam_mail]<http://www.adam.es/>
> 
> De: Pouliot.net [mailto:peter at pouliot.net]
> Enviado el: lunes, 08 de agosto de 2016 19:05
> Para: Emilio Moreno Fernandez
> CC: openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> Asunto: Re: [Openstack-operators] VirtIO and IDE disk
> 
> Sounds like you need to use the correct paravirtualization drivers for the hypervisor you are using.   I highly suggest you create the Windows vm on that hypervisor with certified paravirtualization drivers from the vendor of the Linux distribution you are using.
> 
> If you have more questions, email me here: Openstack at microsoft.com<mailto:Openstack at microsoft.com> and I'll setup a call.
> 
> P
> 
> On Aug 8, 2016, at 9:30 AM, Emilio Moreno Fernandez <emilio.moreno at adam.es<mailto:emilio.moreno at adam.es>> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> We have very problems to launch Windows Server 2012 without viostor driver.
> I can launch with ?hda? and install drivers but before we have BSOD on Windows.
> 
> It?s possible launch instance with one volume on hda and other volume with vdc for example to install drivers without legacy software?
> 
> How I can to resolve this with glance image of Windows imported from ESX Server. (VirtIO drivers are in C:\ )
> 
> Thanks
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Emilio Moreno Fern?ndez
> Departamento de Sistemas
> 
> c/ Artesans, 7 - Parc Tecnol?gic del Vall?s
> 08290 Cerdanyola del Vall?s - Barcelona
> 
> Tel.  902 902 685
> E-mail. emilio.moreno at adam.es<mailto:emilio.moreno at adam.es>
> www.adam.es<http://www.adam.es/>
> 
> <image001.png><https://www.linkedin.com/company/adam-tic> LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/adam-tic>  |   <image002.png><https://twitter.com/adam_tic> @Adam_TIC<https://twitter.com/adam_tic>
> 
> 
> <image003.png><http://www.adam.es/>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20160809/8d2fbbfc/attachment-0001.html>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image001.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 1081 bytes
> Desc: image001.png
> URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20160809/8d2fbbfc/attachment-0003.png>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image002.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 1247 bytes
> Desc: image002.png
> URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20160809/8d2fbbfc/attachment-0004.png>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image003.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 17302 bytes
> Desc: image003.png
> URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20160809/8d2fbbfc/attachment-0005.png>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
> 
> 
> End of OpenStack-operators Digest, Vol 70, Issue 11
> ***************************************************



More information about the OpenStack-operators mailing list