Open Stack

Everett,

Thanks for the details, I wish you would have responded to my original email a couple of weeks ago to avoid any confusion. Anyway, happy to know that the WG is active and we support it.

Cheers,

Edgar

From: Everett Toews <everett.toews at RACKSPACE.COM>
Date: Saturday, August 6, 2016 at 5:41 AM
To: Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com>
Cc: "user-committee at lists.openstack.org" <user-committee at lists.openstack.org>, "openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org" <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>, michael mccune <msm at redhat.com>, Chris Dent <chris.dent at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [User-committee] ACTION Needed - All WGs Chairs

Hi Edgar,

The API Working Group is alive and well. We meet weekly on IRC and send a newsletter to openstack-dev@ for all to stay updated on our progress. I've added us back to the User Committee wiki page.

Mission Statement

To improve the developer experience of API users by converging the OpenStack API to a consistent and pragmatic RESTful design. The working group creates guidelines that all OpenStack projects should follow for new development, and promotes convergence of new APIs and future versions of existing APIs.

Co-chairs:

Chris Dent
Michael McCune
Everett Toews

Guidelines: http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/api-wg/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__specs.openstack.org_openstack_api-2Dwg_&d=DQMFAg&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=RqLaEZX01UYqbVm-od0yEu_wIGoi9PYFe8DEBA1A6Gk&s=fPp5Z_Bv_LbYvYMWVc67kxqRXWXBPhsNxvKED_vCbbg&e=>
Repo: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/api-wg/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__git.openstack.org_cgit_openstack_api-2Dwg_&d=DQMFAg&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=RqLaEZX01UYqbVm-od0yEu_wIGoi9PYFe8DEBA1A6Gk&s=vuXvOWg_xjP3cZkm2lhvOG44mNC00fO_WX_guLIbCrg&e=>
Gerrit: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/api-wg,n,z<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__review.openstack.org_-23_q_status-3Aopen-26-2343-3Bproject-3Aopenstack_api-2Dwg-2Cn-2Cz&d=DQMFAg&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=RqLaEZX01UYqbVm-od0yEu_wIGoi9PYFe8DEBA1A6Gk&s=xLNw1BfaryR2XCqFqGl7igGcRZ4UoOwwiECWnzHSN5g&e=>
Wiki: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/API_Working_Group<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.openstack.org_wiki_API-5FWorking-5FGroup&d=DQMFAg&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=RqLaEZX01UYqbVm-od0yEu_wIGoi9PYFe8DEBA1A6Gk&s=Qx1VeIAnV62QlmQUq_6aO7TBKQIiMCbuVkbS89c72qE&e=> (Communication, Deliverables, How to Contribute, Scope)

Cheers,
Everett


On Jul 7, 2016, at 9:13 PM, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com<mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>> wrote:

Dear Working Groups Chairs,

As you know WGs present an opportunity to consolidate and increase the Community around OpenStack from the User and Operator perspective. One of the goals of the User Committee is to help WGs to have the resources needed to achieve their specific goals and exactly as the TC validates and accepts development projects the UC needs to validate and accept WGs before they be granted with resources and support from UC and the OpenStack Foundation. (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Procedure_for_Creating_a_New_Working_Group)<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.openstack.org_wiki_Procedure-5Ffor-5FCreating-5Fa-5FNew-5FWorking-5FGroup-29&d=DQMFAg&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=RqLaEZX01UYqbVm-od0yEu_wIGoi9PYFe8DEBA1A6Gk&s=JC9mZ0x3Z010TjYlwAD2HrYqw5jMZa38mRbLaaFgqpc&e=>

In order to validate the current work and progress of the existing WGs under:https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/UserCommittee#Working_Groups<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.openstack.org_wiki_Governance_Foundation_UserCommittee-23Working-5FGroups&d=DQMFAg&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=RqLaEZX01UYqbVm-od0yEu_wIGoi9PYFe8DEBA1A6Gk&s=KZCRH9pwngjzVnrCa6Rv32FXtnCK30vJ8MRikM3P4xU&e=>
The UC would like to have all chairs to reply to this thread with the status of the WG and their plans for the Barcelona summit. This is also an opportunity to have a space allocated to get together and discuss about work and activities. This is only for existing WGs not for new ones. If we do not hear from WG Chairs, we will assume that those WGs are no longer active and therefore they will be removed from UC documentation.

Please, reach out to us with a short report of the activities (wikis, etherpads, repos, etc).

Thanks,

Edgar, Shilla and Jon
UC Members.

_______________________________________________
User-committee mailing list
User-committee at lists.openstack.org<mailto:User-committee at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/user-committee<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.openstack.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_user-2Dcommittee&d=DQMFAg&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=G0XRJfDQsuBvqa_wpWyDAUlSpeMV4W1qfWqBfctlWwQ&m=RqLaEZX01UYqbVm-od0yEu_wIGoi9PYFe8DEBA1A6Gk&s=o-0X2zS9Y9jMvvr6n3Md7oU6k8yACcEEfARAzEhdNBQ&e=>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20160808/5d1216e4/attachment-0001.html>