Open Stack

Sounds like a recipe for confusion?

On 1 August 2016 at 10:23, Steven Dake (stdake) <stdake at cisco.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/31/16, 7:13 AM, "Jay Pipes" <jaypipes at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On 07/29/2016 11:35 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
>>> Hey folks,
>>>
>>> In Kolla we have a significant bug in that Horizon can't be used because
>>> it requires a member user.  We have a few approaches to fixing this
>>> problem in mind, but want to understand what Operators want.  Devstack
>>> itself has switched between member and _member_ although Devstack isn't
>>> our reference: Operators are.
>>>
>>> Which of those do operators prefer (if either).
>>>
>>> Another question was whether we should create a default user named
>>> "user" and use this in place of member.
>>
>>"member" is a role, not a user. The default unprivileged user is named
>>"demo" and has the "member" role in a project called "demo".
>
> Yup, thanks for the correction.
>
>>
>>Are you asking what the name of the unprivileged *role* should be by
>>default in Kolla installations? Or are you asking what, if any, a
>>default unprivileged *user* should be called?
>
> The idea of adding a user called "user" with a role called "user" was
> proposed.  Curious if operators care to want that.
>
> Regards
> -steve
>
>>
>>Best,
>>-jay
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>OpenStack-operators mailing list
>>OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators



-- 
Cheers,
~Blairo