[Openstack-operators] Maintenance

Juvonen, Tomi (Nokia - FI/Espoo) tomi.juvonen at nokia.com
Fri Apr 15 06:56:45 UTC 2016


Thanks, this is great.

Br,
Tomi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: EXT Tom Fifield [mailto:tom at openstack.org]
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 9:33 AM
> To: Juvonen, Tomi (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <tomi.juvonen at nokia.com>; openstack-
> operators at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Maintenance
> 
> OK, you're on the agenda!
> 
> 
> Hilton Austin - MR 406
> Monday, April 25, 2:50pm-3:30pm
> https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/events/9516
> 
> Moderators guide is at:
> 
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Operations/Meetups#Moderators_Guide
> 
> Etherpad for your session:
> 
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/AUS-ops-Nova-maint
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 14/04/16 18:45, Juvonen, Tomi (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > Yes, it would be good to have a discussion session and I could be a
> moderator.
> >
> > Br,
> > Tomi
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: EXT Tom Fifield [mailto:tom at openstack.org]
> >> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 1:16 PM
> >> To: openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Maintenance
> >>
> >> Hi Tomi,
> >>
> >> This seems like a pretty important topic.
> >>
> >> In addition to this thread, would you consider moderating an ops summit
> >> discussion in Austin to gather more about how ops run maintenance on
> >> their nova installs?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >>
> >> Tom
> >>
> >> On 14/04/16 17:14, Juvonen, Tomi (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
> >>> Hi Ops,
> >>> I am working in OPNFV Doctor project that has the Telco perspective
> >>> about host maintenance related requirements to OpenStack. Already
> talked
> >>> some in dev mailing list and Nova team, but would like to have operator
> >>> perspective and interest for maintenance related changes. Not sure
> where
> >>> this will lead, but even a new OpenStack project to fulfil the
> >>> requirements. This will be somehow also close to fault monitoring
> >>> systems as these NFV related flows are very similar and also monitoring
> >>> needs to be aware of the maintenance. I will also be in Austin together
> >>> with other OPNFV Doctor people, if to discuss something there.
> >>> Here is link to OPNFV Doctor requirements:
> >>> _http://artifacts.opnfv.org/doctor/docs/requirements/02-
> >> use_cases.html#nvfi-maintenance_
> >>> <http://artifacts.opnfv.org/doctor/docs/requirements/02-use_cases.html>
> >>> _http://artifacts.opnfv.org/doctor/docs/requirements/03-
> >> architecture.html#nfvi-maintenance_
> >>> <http://artifacts.opnfv.org/doctor/docs/requirements/03-
> >> architecture.html>
> >>> _http://artifacts.opnfv.org/doctor/docs/requirements/05-
> >> implementation.html#nfvi-maintenance_
> >>> <http://artifacts.opnfv.org/doctor/docs/requirements/05-
> >> implementation.html>
> >>> Here is what I could transfer as use cases, but would ask feedback to
> >>> get more:
> >>> As admin I want to set maintenance period for certain host.
> >>> As admin I want to know when host is ready to actions to be done by
> admin
> >>> during the maintenance. Meaning physical resources are emptied.
> >>> As owner of a server I want to prepare for maintenance to minimize
> >> downtime,
> >>> keep capacity on needed level and switch HA service to server not
> >>> affected by
> >>> maintenance.
> >>> As owner of a server I want to know when my servers will be down
> because
> >> of
> >>> host maintenance as it might be servers are not moved to another host.
> >>> As owner of a server I want to know if host is to be totally removed,
> so
> >>> instead of keeping my servers on host during maintenance, I want to
> move
> >>> them
> >>> to somewhere else.
> >>> As owner of a server I want to send acknowledgement to be ready for
> host
> >>> maintenance and I want to state if servers are to be moved or kept on
> >> host.
> >>> Removal and creating of server is in owner's control already.
> Optionally
> >>> server
> >>> Configuration data could hold information about automatic actions to be
> >>> done
> >>> when host is going down unexpectedly or in controlled manner. Also
> >>> actions at
> >>> the same if down permanently or only temporarily. Still this needs
> >>> acknowledgement from server owner as he needs time for application
> level
> >>> controlled HA service switchover.
> >>> Br,
> >>> Tomi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> >>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> >> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators



More information about the OpenStack-operators mailing list