So this will require bash scripts to adhere to bashate before being accepted? Is it possible to have the check as non-voting? Does this open the door to having other file types be checked? IMHO, it's more important for the OSOps project to foster collaboration and contributions rather than worry about an accepted style. As an example, yesterday's commits used hard-tabs: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/228545/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/228534/ I think we're going to see a lot of variation of styles coming in. I don't want to come off as sounding ignorant or disrespectful to other projects that have guidelines in place -- I fully understand and respect those decisions. Joe On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:52 PM, JJ Asghar <jj at chef.io> wrote: > Awesome! That works! > > Best Regards, > JJ Asghar > c: 512.619.0722 t: @jjasghar irc: j^2 > > On 9/29/15 1:27 PM, Christian Berendt wrote: > > On 09/29/2015 07:45 PM, JJ Asghar wrote: > >> So this popped up today[1]. This seems like something that should be > >> leveraged in our gates/validations? > > > > I prepared review requests to enable checks on the gates for > > > > * osops-tools-monitoring: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/229094/ > > * osops-tools-generic: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/229043/ > > > > Christian. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150929/abfcd264/attachment.html>