[Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Allowing DNS suffix to be set per subnet (at least per tenant)

Maish Saidel-Keesing maishsk at maishsk.com
Thu Sep 3 20:07:37 UTC 2015


On 09/03/15 20:51, Gal Sagie wrote:
> I am not sure if this address what you need specifically, but it would 
> be worth checking these
> two approved liberty specs:
>
> 1) 
> https://github.com/openstack/neutron-specs/blob/master/specs/liberty/internal-dns-resolution.rst
> 2) 
> https://github.com/openstack/neutron-specs/blob/master/specs/liberty/external-dns-resolution.rst
>
Thanks Gal,

So I see that from the bp [1] the fqdn will be configurable for each and 
every port ?

I think that this does open up a number of interesting possibilities, 
but I would also think that it would be sufficient to do this on a 
subnet level?

We do already have the option of setting nameservers per subnet - I 
assume the data model is already implemented - which is interesting - 
because I don't see that as part of the information that is sent by 
dnsmasq so it must be coming from neutron somewhere.

The domain suffix - definitely is handled by dnsmasq.


> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Steve Wormley <openstack at wormley.com 
> <mailto:openstack at wormley.com>> wrote:
>
>     As far as I am aware it is not presently built-in to Openstack.
>     You'll need to add a dnsmasq_config_file option to your dhcp agent
>     configurations and then populate the file with:
>     domain=DOMAIN_NAME,CIDR for each network
>     i.e.
>     domain=example.com <http://example.com>,10.11.22.0/24
>     <http://10.11.22.0/24>
>     ...
>
>     -Steve
>
>
>     On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Maish Saidel-Keesing
>     <maishsk at maishsk.com <mailto:maishsk at maishsk.com>> wrote:
>
>         Hello all (cross-posting to openstack-operators as well)
>
>         Today the setting of the dns suffix that is provided to the
>         instance is passed through dhcp_agent.
>
>         There is the option of setting different DNS servers per
>         subnet (and and therefore tenant) but the domain suffix is
>         something that stays the same throughout the whole system is
>         the domain suffix.
>
>         I see that this is not a current neutron feature.
>
>         Is this on the roadmap? Are there ways to achieve this today?
>         If so I would be very interested in hearing how.
>
>         Thanks
>         -- 
>         Best Regards,
>         Maish Saidel-Keesing
>
>         __________________________________________________________________________
>         OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>         Unsubscribe:
>         OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>         <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>         http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>     __________________________________________________________________________
>     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>     Unsubscribe:
>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>     <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Best Regards ,
>
> The G.

-- 
Best Regards,
Maish Saidel-Keesing
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150903/4fb6dbc0/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-operators mailing list