[Openstack-operators] raw ephemeral disks and qcow2 images
Adam Huffman
adam.huffman at gmail.com
Mon Oct 26 08:49:38 UTC 2015
Just wanted to mention in this context that those of us with GPFS
backing stores need RAW to allow copy-on-write image and volume
creation.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On 25/10/15 23:57, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 07:42:53AM +0000, Tim Bell wrote:
>>> Always having ephemeral disks as raw might make sense given that there
>>> is going to be little overlap with others (and therefore the qcow2
>>> benefits are not significant)
>>
>>The current big benefit for qcow2 is really the abilityo have a
>>backing file, but Nova only uses that for the root disk, so having
>>it for ephemeral disks isn't important and so they could easily be
>>raw.
>
> +1… agreed
>
>>
>>
>>Regards,
>>Daniel
>>--
>>|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
>>|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
>>|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
>>|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
More information about the OpenStack-operators
mailing list