Open Stack

it's a voted position.  there just aren't that many operators who vote
compared to devs and other contributors.  to say nothing of
non-contributors who sign up for accounts to vote for their co-workers.

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Subbu Allamaraju <subbu at subbu.org> wrote:

> +1. Operator/user community is large enough for such a representation.
>
> Can you elaborate on operators lacking the power?
>
>
> On Nov 23, 2015, at 11:39 AM, matt <matt at nycresistor.com> wrote:
>
> Yeah, I'd like to see that as well.  Joe Tapajian would be my pick.  But I
> don't see that happening.  Operators just don't have the voting power the
> devs do.  Unless someone wants to spam their own corp backers for voting
> support ( not really ethical, though obviously being done ).
>
> -Matt
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 2:09 PM, David Medberry <openstack at medberry.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Isn't it time to get an operational director--or rather
>> another/additional operators as directors? I've nominated a few (unnamed
>> here) and you may be interested in nominationg others. Look for the email
>> with subject line:
>> Notice of meeting to elect Individual Directors
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20151123/faeb4cfe/attachment.html>