+1. Operator/user community is large enough for such a representation. Can you elaborate on operators lacking the power? > On Nov 23, 2015, at 11:39 AM, matt <matt at nycresistor.com> wrote: > > Yeah, I'd like to see that as well. Joe Tapajian would be my pick. But I don't see that happening. Operators just don't have the voting power the devs do. Unless someone wants to spam their own corp backers for voting support ( not really ethical, though obviously being done ). > > -Matt > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 2:09 PM, David Medberry <openstack at medberry.net <mailto:openstack at medberry.net>> wrote: > Hi all, > > Isn't it time to get an operational director--or rather another/additional operators as directors? I've nominated a few (unnamed here) and you may be interested in nominationg others. Look for the email with subject line: > Notice of meeting to elect Individual Directors > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org <mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators> > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20151123/40789017/attachment.html>