Open Stack

We do run Cinder on dedicated controllers, though, so no mix of Kilo and Juno services on
the controllers.

Cheers,
 Arne


On 18 Nov 2015, at 13:19, Belmiro Moreira <moreira.belmiro.email.lists at gmail.com<mailto:moreira.belmiro.email.lists at gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Saverio,
we always upgrade one component at a time.
Cinder was one of the first components that we upgraded to kilo,
meaning that other components (glance, nova, ...) were running Juno.

We didn't have any problem with this setup.

Belmiro
CERN

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Saverio Proto <zioproto at gmail.com<mailto:zioproto at gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello there,

I need to quickly find a workaround to be able to use ceph object map
features for cinder volumes with rbd backend.

However, upgrading everything from Juno to Kilo will require a lot of
time for testing and updating all my puppet modules.

Do you think it is feasible to start updating just cinder to Kilo ?
Will it work with the rest of the Juno components ?

Has someone here experience in running mixed components between Juno and Kilo ?

thanks

Saverio

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20151118/867fe904/attachment.html>