[Openstack-operators] Multiple vlan ranges on same physical interface [ml2]
Kevin Benton
blak111 at gmail.com
Sat May 9 00:08:38 UTC 2015
So if you don't let tenants allocate networks, then why do the VLAN ranges
in neutron matter? It can just be part of your net-create scripts.
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:35 AM, George Shuklin <george.shuklin at gmail.com>
wrote:
> We've got a bunch of business logic above openstack. It's allocating
> VLANs on-fly for external networks and connect pieces outside neutron
> (configuring hardware router, etc).
>
> Anyway, after some research we've decided to completely ditch idea of
> 'tenant networks'. All networks are external and handled by our software
> with administrative rights.
>
> All networks for tenant are created during tenant bootstrap, including
> local networks which are now looking funny 'external local network without
> gateway'. By nailing every moving part in 'neutron net-create' we've got
> stable behaviour and kept allocation database inside our software. That
> kills a huge part of openstack idea, but at least it works straightforward
> and nice.
>
> I really like to see all that been implemented in vendor plugins for
> neutron, but average code and documentation quality for them are below any
> usable level, so we implements hw configuration by ourselves.
>
>
> On 05/08/2015 09:15 AM, Kevin Benton wrote:
>
> If one set of VLANs is for external networks which are created by admins,
> why even specify network_vlan_ranges for that set?
>
> For example, even if network_vlan_ranges is 'local:1000:4000', you can
> still successfully run the following as an admin:
> neutron net-create --provider:network_type=vlan
> --provider:physical_network=local --provider:segmentation_id=40 myextnet
> --router:external
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:32 AM, George Shuklin <george.shuklin at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone.
>>
>> Got a problem: we want to use same physical interface for external
>> networks and virtual (tenant) networks. All inside vlans with different
>> ranges.
>>
>> My expected config was:
>>
>> [ml2]
>> type_drivers = vlan
>> tenant_network_types = vlan
>> [ml2_type_vlan]
>> network_vlan_ranges = external:1:100,local:1000:4000
>> [ovs]
>> bridge_mappings = external:br-ex,local:br-ex
>>
>> But it does not work:
>>
>> ERROR neutron.plugins.openvswitch.agent.ovs_neutron_agent [-] Parsing
>> bridge_mappings failed: Value br-ex in mapping: 'gp:br-ex' not unique.
>> Agent terminated!
>>
>> I understand that I can cheat and manually configure bridge pile (br-ex
>> and br-loc both plugged to br-real, which linked to physical interface),
>> but it looks very fragile.
>>
>> Is any nicer way to do this? And why ml2 (ovs plugin?) does not allow to
>> use mapping from many networks to one bridge?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Kevin Benton
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
--
Kevin Benton
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150508/057e6806/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-operators
mailing list