Open Stack

The fundamental problem with a CMDB implementation as I see it, is you are
effectively in need of a shared comm services for fast action small meta
data sets.

That becomes a project all in it's own right.

-matt

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Allamaraju, Subbu <subbu at subbu.org> wrote:

> Hi Tom,
>
> Thanks for adding this slot.
>
> We do have a fairly full-fledged CMDB in house that keeps tracks of all
> our infra and apps. Unfortunately none of that team is going to be able to
> make it to the Summit, but I’m trying to have someone do a demo remotely
> and participate on EtherPad.
>
> Subbu
>
> > On May 6, 2015, at 3:04 AM, Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is anyone interested enough in CMDB to run a working session on it at
> > the design summit?
> >
> >
> https://libertydesignsummit.sched.org/event/553947ceb7c1c223fa689da188abb9a9
> >
> > It was suggested on the planning etherpad, but so far we've found no-one
> > interested in running it.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> > Tom
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-operators mailing list
> > OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150507/e18de062/attachment.html>