Open Stack

Thanks Miguel!

The command line reference set looks good, although I'm curious what the
openstackclient version of them will be.  I've also left a comment on the
spec review.


- jlk

On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Miguel Ángel Ajo <majopela at redhat.com>
wrote:

>
> Hello, we're working [1] on the QoS API definition and we’d like to get
> some feedback from
> operators on [2] and [3].
>
> We’re scoping the work we intend to do in Liberty to make sure it will be
> doable, but we plan
> to extend it via subsequent iterations:
>     * traffic marking (dscp, VLAN 802.1p, ipv6 flow labels..)
>     * L3/L4 protocol matching of rules (i.e UDP port=5060.., TCP port=80)
>     * bandwidth guarantees in conjunction with nova scheduling
>     * congestion notification…
>
>
> Best regards,
> Miguel Ángel Ajo
>
> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QoS
> [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-qos-api-preview
> [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88599
>
>
> Miguel Ángel Ajo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150504/93678229/attachment.html>