[Openstack-operators] What are people using for configuration management? Puppet? Chef? Other?

John Dewey john at dewey.ws
Thu Mar 26 18:42:15 UTC 2015


We use ansible to orchestrate puppet.  Why?  We already were using puppet, and the eventual convergence is a pain.  Also, we are able to piecemeal out puppet for ansible as we move forward. 

John 


On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:

> We are using Ansible. We need the orchestration capability that Ansible provides, particularly for upgrades where pieces have to move in a very coordinated order.
> 
> https://github.com/blueboxgroup/ursula
> 
> - jlk 
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Forrest Flagg <fostro.flagg at gmail.com (mailto:fostro.flagg at gmail.com)> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Getting ready to install a Juno or Kilo cloud and was wondering what people are using for configuration management to deploy openstack.  Are you using Puppet, Chef, something else?  What was the decision process for making your choice?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Forrest 
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-operators mailing list
> > OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org (mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org)
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org (mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org)
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150326/d188bd07/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-operators mailing list