[Openstack-operators] Hypervisor decision
Abel Lopez
alopgeek at gmail.com
Wed Mar 18 21:53:48 UTC 2015
Interesting topic, since you're already running Hyper-v and ESX, I'm inferring that your workload is heavy on windows VMs.
If you're doing majority windows, and minority linux, stick with hyper-v. The benchmarks I've read show that windows VMs run fastest on hyper-v VS all others.
If you expect an even split, it might make sense to create Host Aggregates of various hypervisiors like hyper-v and KVM, and utilize extra-specs in the flavors and guest images to aid in scheduling, for example "Windows images launch on the hyper-v pool"
> On Mar 18, 2015, at 2:41 PM, Vytenis Silgalis <vsilgalis at outlook.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking to champion openstack at my company, we currently run both a small hyper-v cluster and 3 VMware clusters. However we are not married to any specific hypervisor. What I'm looking for is recommendations for which hypervisor we should look at for our openstack environments and the pros/con's people have run into with the various hypervisors supported by openstack.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Vytenis
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150318/fef5ba6c/attachment.pgp>
More information about the OpenStack-operators
mailing list