[Openstack-operators] [nova] Deprecation of ComputeFilter
Toshikazu Ichikawa
ichikawa.toshikazu at lab.ntt.co.jp
Mon Mar 9 04:08:03 UTC 2015
Hi Kris,
Yes. It should work with even disabled host.
Thanks,
Kazu
-----Original Message-----
From: Kris G. Lindgren [mailto:klindgren at godaddy.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2015 3:54 AM
To: Jesse Keating; Jay Pipes; openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] Deprecation of ComputeFilter
I was wondering if doing the target host deployment is effected by the
status of the compute host?
IE can you do: nova boot --availability-zone <zone>:<server> on a server
that is marked as disabled in nova?
____________________________________________
Kris Lindgren
Senior Linux Systems Engineer
GoDaddy, LLC.
On 3/6/15, 11:43 AM, "Jesse Keating" <jlk at bluebox.net> wrote:
>On 3/6/15 10:27 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>>
>> As for adding another CONF option, I'm -1 on that. I see no valid
>> reason to schedule workloads to disabled hosts.
>
>There may be a better way to skin this cat, but one scenario is we have
>a host that has alerted, we want to evacuate it and prevent any future
>builds from going there so we disable it. But after repairing, we want
>to introduce OUR load to it first to test it before putting CUSTOMER
>load on it, so we'd like to be able to schedule something to the
>disabled host.
>
>--
>-jlk
>
>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-operators mailing list
>OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
More information about the OpenStack-operators
mailing list