Open Stack

On 3/6/15 10:27 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
> As for adding another CONF option, I'm -1 on that. I see no valid reason
> to schedule workloads to disabled hosts.

There may be a better way to skin this cat, but one scenario is we have 
a host that has alerted, we want to evacuate it and prevent any future 
builds from going there so we disable it. But after repairing, we want 
to introduce OUR load to it first to test it before putting CUSTOMER 
load on it, so we'd like to be able to schedule something to the 
disabled host.

-- 
-jlk