Open Stack

Hi Vishal,
do you have a effective recipe to test if the rabbitmq's HA ?
I've three instances of it; I've also nova, cinder and neutron 
configured with rabbit_ha_queues = true.

Just restarting a rabbit instance seems not to be sufficient to test a 
real case scenario, is it ?

any advice ?

thanks,

     Alvise

On 28/07/2015 09:46, vishal yadav wrote:
> You're welcome :)
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Alvise Dorigo 
> <alvise.dorigo at pd.infn.it <mailto:alvise.dorigo at pd.infn.it>> wrote:
>
>     thank you very much Vishal.
>
>         A.
>
>
>     On 28/07/2015 09:41, vishal yadav wrote:
>>     >> "ha_all" vs. "HA".
>>     >> which one is correct ?
>>
>>     That's the policy name, you can name anything...
>>
>>     Excerpt from 'man rabbitmqctl'
>>     ...
>>     set_policy [-p vhostpath] {name} {pattern} {definition} [priority]
>>                Sets a policy.
>>
>>                name
>>                    The name of the policy.
>>
>>                pattern
>>                    The regular expression, which when matches on a
>>     given resources causes the policy to apply.
>>
>>                definition
>>                    The definition of the policy, as a JSON term. In
>>     most shells you are very likely to need to quote this.
>>
>>                priority
>>                    The priority of the policy as an integer,
>>     defaulting to 0. Higher numbers indicate greater precedence.
>>     ...
>>
>>     Regards,
>>     Vishal
>>
>>
>>     On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Alvise Dorigo
>>     <alvise.dorigo at pd.infn.it <mailto:alvise.dorigo at pd.infn.it>> wrote:
>>
>>         Hi,
>>         I read these two documents:
>>
>>         http://docs.openstack.org/high-availability-guide/content/_configure_rabbitmq.html
>>
>>         https://www.rdoproject.org/RabbitMQ
>>
>>         To configure the queues in HA mode, the two docs suggests two
>>         slightly different commands;
>>
>>         The first one says:
>>
>>         rabbitmqctl set_policy ha-all '^(?!amq\.).*' '{"ha-mode": "all"}'
>>
>>
>>         while the second one says:
>>
>>         rabbitmqctl set_policy HA '^(?!amq\.).*' '{"ha-mode": "all"}'
>>
>>
>>         "ha_all" vs. "HA".
>>
>>         which one is correct ?
>>
>>         thanks,
>>
>>             Alvise
>>
>>         __________________________________________________________________________
>>         OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>         Unsubscribe:
>>         OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>         <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>>         http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150728/ff6231d5/attachment.html>