Open Stack

​Sorry for the blank reply, hot keys got the better of me :)


@Adam


Are there any plans to create a publicly available LXC template that we could used by others and when you say "I'd leave the issues with getting blessed RHEL LXC support to Red Hat​" do you imaging RedHat providing images/templates to deployers wanting to deploy on RHEL?​


I noticed that the LXC tooling that RedHat provides is old and while functional its not using the lxc python 3 clients or libraries. Are there any plans to repack LXC using the available py3m packages that are in RHEL7.1?

In terms of pip vs rpm/deb packages are there things that RedHat will not specifically support when using pip? Is it that any use of pip would invalidate general RHEL host support? I ask because we already have all of the tooling to support a source based deployment which has the ability to do rolling upgrades and while I've only experimented with adding RedHat as base host OS (tested using RHEL 7/7.1) it shouldn't be a huge forklift to get that work done though adding in distinct code paths for deployments powered by packages would be a lot more work. As for Fedora support, I dont think thats far off once we have a base RHEL/CentOS7 system running.

--

Kevin

________________________________
From: Adam Young <ayoung at redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 10:59 AM
To: Kevin Carter; Kris G. Lindgren; John Dewey
Cc: openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] OSAD for RHEL

On 07/10/2015 02:25 PM, Kevin Carter wrote:

To be clear the present OSAD project really has no intention to bring package based installations of OpenStack. We'd certainly not reject the idea and wouldn't mind having an implementation spec for it but all of our current tooling and design principles have been based on the fact that we've move away from distro packages and on to upstream source as it pertains to OpenStack. The system as it stands today creates an internal repository of built wheels for your environment and all of the OpenStack services are installed within LXC containers, where possible and it makes sense. The installation of these bits comes from the internal wheel repository and uses pip and all of the pre / post config happens within the Ansible playbooks.

I understand your frustration with the packaging approach.  For a first approximation, getting the code for OpenStack/Python operations out of Pip makes sense.  Ideally, we would be able to support both approaches.  Red Hat would not support a pip based install, but I am sure some Centos base users would be happy with pip.

We had the same general discussion around devstack.



One issue that will become a problem, for users of RedHat specifically, is the fact that RedHat has no LXC container templates (at least none that are publicly available) and even if someone were to make an official RedHat container template there'd be issues with the containers being able to connect to the satellite servers as well as other potential license problems.

I'd leave the issues with getting blessed RHEL LXC support to Red Hat.  Making something that works for CentOS with publically available LXC containers there would be more what I expect from OSAD upstream.

What about Fedora support?  It seems to me that we would be far more likely to have something supportable with Fedora that could then be backported to CentOS?



I've done some experimenting with a RedHat 7.1 hosts and CentOS 7 containers and things seem to work OK but I'd not say that I have really put a lot of effort into it. That said, if its something that you'd all like to work on I'd be happy to help out to make it all go.

Sounds good.  I'll give it a try after the Keystone Midcycle.



--

Kevin Carter
________________________________
From: Adam Young <ayoung at redhat.com><mailto:ayoung at redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2015 11:32 AM
To: Kris G. Lindgren; John Dewey
Cc: openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] OSAD for RHEL

On 07/09/2015 02:16 AM, Kris G. Lindgren wrote:
Does OSP support running each service in an LXC container as well?  What about nova-cells? How does it handle people who need to carry local changes?  What is the upgrade path like with OSP?

So, ignoring the Hypervisor for the moment, there is no reason that the rest of the controllers can't run in separate Containers.  I think a container based deployment would be fantastic.

venv is not really sufficient, as the system level binaries can still conflict (MysQL and LDAP both require system libraries for Keystone, for example)

From an Ansible perspective;  we need to  be able to share the HTTPD instance for Keystone and Apache, and getting that right will solve most of the issues deploying in a secure manner.  Putting Them on separate hosts or containers should be a degenerate case, and thus be supported, too.







Asking, because in Philly the general consensus, I fel,t was people want to move away from the current system level package stuff and move towards: venv's, "lightweight packages", containers.  The only reason that was brought up to keep packages around was to solve the non-python lib stuff and using a depsolver (yum/apt) that doesn't suck (pip).  So I am pretty sure my wants are inline with what other people in the community are either already doing or moving towards.
___________________________________________

Kris Lindgren
Senior Linux Systems Engineer
GoDaddy, LLC.


From: John Dewey <john at dewey.ws<mailto:john at dewey.ws>>
Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 11:43 PM
To: "Kris G. Lindgren" <klindgren at godaddy.com<mailto:klindgren at godaddy.com>>
Cc: Adam Young <ayoung at redhat.com<mailto:ayoung at redhat.com>>, "openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>" <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] OSAD for RHEL

This would not be acceptable for those running OSP.


On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Kris G. Lindgren wrote:

I should be more clear. My current thought is to have a venv packaged
inside an rpm - so the rpm includes the needed init scripts, ensures the
required system level binaries are installed, adds the users - ect ect.
But would be a single deployable autonomous unit. Also, have a versioning
schema to roll forward and back between venvs for quick update/rollback.
We are already working on doing something similar to this to run kilo on
cent6 boxen, until we can finish revving the remaining parts of the fleet
to cent7.

My desire is to move away from using system level python & openstack
packages, so that I can possibly run mismatched versions if I need to. We
had a need to run kilo ceilometer and juno neutron/nova on a single
server. The conflicting python requirements between those made that task
impossible. In general I want to get away from treating Openstack as a
single system that everything needs to be upgraded in lock step (packages
force you into this). I want to move to being able to upgrade say
oslo.messaging to a newer version on just say nova on my control plane
servers. Or upgrade nova to kilo while keeping the rest of the system
(neutron) on juno. Unless I run each service in a vm/container or on a
physical piece of hardware that is pretty much impossible to do with
packages - outside of placing everything inside venv's.

However, it is my understanding that OSAD already builds its own
python-wheels and runs those inside lxc containers. So I don¹t really
follow what good throwing those into an rpm would really do?
____________________________________________
Kris Lindgren
Senior Linux Systems Engineer
GoDaddy, LLC.


On 7/8/15, 10:33 PM, "Adam Young" <ayoung at redhat.com<mailto:ayoung at redhat.com>> wrote:

On 07/07/2015 05:55 PM, Kris G. Lindgren wrote:
+1 on RHEL support. I have some interest in moving away from packages
and
am interested in the OSAD tooling as well.

I would not recommend an approach targetting RHEL that does not use
packages.

OSAD support for RHEL using packages would be an outstanding tool.

Which way are you planning on taking it?

____________________________________________
Kris Lindgren
Senior Linux Systems Engineer
GoDaddy, LLC.







On 7/7/15, 3:38 PM, "Abel Lopez" <alopgeek at gmail.com<mailto:alopgeek at gmail.com>> wrote:

Hey everyone,
I've started looking at osad, and I like much of the direction it
takes.
I'm pretty interested in developing it to run on RHEL, I just wanted to
check if anyone would be -2 opposed to that before I spend cycles on
it.

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150714/f2496000/attachment.html>