[Openstack-operators] Packaging sample config versions
George Shuklin
george.shuklin at gmail.com
Wed Jan 28 21:56:06 UTC 2015
Yes!
Just had have discussion about this with my colleague yesterday.
Seems be perfect solution.
On 01/28/2015 12:00 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Based on Gustavo's excellent work below, talking with many ops, and
> after a brief chats with Jeremey and a few other TC folks, here's what
> I'd propose as an end goal:
>
>
> * A git repository that has raw, sample configs in it for each project
> that will be automagically updated
>
> * Raw configs distributed in the tar files we make as part of the release
>
>
> Does that seem acceptable for us all?
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> On 21/01/15 13:22, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
>>
>> On 12/18/2014 09:57 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>>> 4. Set up a service that periodically regenerates sample
>>> configuration and tracks it over time. This attempts to address the
>>> stated desire to be able to see how sample configurations change,
>>> but note that this is a somewhat artificial presentation since there
>>> are a lot of variables (described earlier) influencing the contents
>>> of such samples--any attempt to render it as a linear/chronological
>>> series could be misleading.
>>
>> i've setup a github repo where i dump sample config files for the
>> projects that autogenerate them, because i know nothing about rpm build
>> tools i only do it for debian and ubuntu packages.
>>
>> if you build your deb packages you can use my, very simple and basic,
>> scripts to autogenerate the sample config files.
>>
>>
>> the repo is here
>>
>> https://github.com/gfa/os-sample-configs
>>
>> i will happily move to osops or other community repo
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
More information about the OpenStack-operators
mailing list