[Openstack-operators] Specifying multiple tenants for aggregate_multitenancy_isolation_filter
    John Dewey 
    john at dewey.ws
       
    Tue Jan 27 22:12:19 UTC 2015
    
    
  
On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 1/27/15 1:54 PM, Sam Morrison wrote:
> > Hi operators,
> >  
> > I have a review up to fix this filter to allow multiple tenants, there
> > are 2 proposed ways in which this can be specified.
> >  
> > 1. using a comma e.g., tenantid1,tenantid2
> > 2. Using a json list eg. [“tenantid1”, “tenantid2”]
> >  
> > Which one do you think is better?
> >  
> > https://review.openstack.org/148807
>  
> Is this intended to be written by a human using the command line tools,  
> or to be filled in via other methods?
>  
> For command line tools, making it json seems wrong, and a comma list  
> would be more friendly. Internally the command line tools could easily  
> format it as a json list to pass along.
>  
>  
Yeah, I agree with this perspective.
  
>  
> What do the other various things that take lists expect? I'd say that's  
> more of a consideration too, uniformity across the inputs.
>  
> --  
> -jlk
>  
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org (mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org)
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>  
>  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150127/47ffb28a/attachment.html>
    
    
More information about the OpenStack-operators
mailing list