[Openstack-operators] Small openstack
joe.gordon0 at gmail.com
Sun Jan 18 21:55:30 UTC 2015
On Dec 22, 2014 1:58 PM, "Tom Fifield" <tom at openstack.org> wrote:
> On 21/12/14 08:09, matt wrote:
> > the only issue with nova-network here is that it's FINALLY slated to be
> > removed in the next release.
This is simply not true. While we are trying to deprecate nova network this
hasn't happened yet.
> Is it? :) Based on recent emails, it seems like the requisite migration
> path might not make it (and here's also hoping that DVR improves). The
> other thing to note is that if the migration does make it in Kilo,
> there's probably a 'deprecation' cycle before removal of nova-network.
That is correct, we will officially deprecate it before removing.
> > so yes it will work, and it may even be optimal for this size
> > deployment, but it will NOT be at all future proofed.
> > I'd go with neutron as of now.
> > -matt
> > On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 5:16 PM, George Shuklin
> > <george.shuklin at gmail.com <mailto:george.shuklin at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > Hello.
> > I've suddenly got request for small installation of openstack (about
> > 3-5 computes).
> > They need almost nothing (just a management panel to span simple
> > instances, few friendly tennants), and I curious, is nova-network
> > good solution for this? They don't want network node and do 'network
> > node on compute' is kinda sad.
> > (And one more: did anyone tried to put management stuff on compute
> > node in mild production?)
> > _________________________________________________
> > OpenStack-operators mailing list
> > OpenStack-operators at lists.__openstack.org
> > <mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
> > <
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OpenStack-operators