[Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Should Keystone emit notifications by default?
Matt Riedemann
mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Mon Feb 2 17:55:53 UTC 2015
On 6/5/2014 10:02 AM, Jesse Pretorius wrote:
> On 5 June 2014 16:46, Assaf Muller <amuller at redhat.com
> <mailto:amuller at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Keystone started emitting notifications [1] for users and tenants
> being created / updated /
> deleted during the Havana cycle. This was in response to bug [2],
> the fact that OpenStack
> doesn't clean up after itself when tenants are deleted. Currently,
> Keystone does not emit
> these notifications by default, and I propose it should. According
> to the principle of least
> surprise, I would imagine that if an admin deleted a tenant he would
> expect that all of its
> resources would be deleted, making the default configuration values
> in Keystone and the other
> projects very important. I wouldn't want to rely on the different
> deployment tools to change
> the needed configuration values.
>
> I was hoping to get some feedback from operators regarding this.
>
>
> As a deployer, I most certainly would prefer that this is enabled by
> default.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
Re-posted and changed the subject here [1], trying to get some
cross-project focus on this for the Vancouver summit.
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-February/055801.html
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
More information about the OpenStack-operators
mailing list