Open Stack

Make sense Flavio, we have approved the spec to delete the downgrade but we
can wait a bit more and decide if we warn the deprecation and delete in N
or if we do it as long as no one is actually using it.


On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:01 AM Flavio Percoco <flavio at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 03/12/15 12:08 +0000, Telles Nobrega wrote:
> >Hello all,
> >
> >we from Trove, want to remove the downgrade fuctionality from our SQL
> Schema.
> >This was a TC approved spec for all projects across OpenStack[1] and we
> need to
> >follow this process as well.
> >We would like to know if are there anyone using this functionality and
> that
> >removing it would be a complete mess up for your environment.
> >If anyone here is against this please speak up, we are gonna wait 48h and
> if we
> >get no negative response we will move forward and remove downgrade.
>
> Hey Telles,
>
> It's always recommended to wait for a bit more than 48h (1 week?).
>
> That being said, we (Glance) moved forward with this by adding first a
> deprecation warning on downgrades and deferring the deletion to N so
> that OPs that are actually using it (no idea if there are) can move
> away from it.
>
> Flavio
>
> >
> >Thanks in advance,
> >
> >
> >[1] http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/openstack-specs/specs/
> >no-downward-sql-migration.html
> >--
> >Telles Nobrega
> >Software Engineer @ Red Hat
>
> >_______________________________________________
> >OpenStack-operators mailing list
> >OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
> --
> @flaper87
> Flavio Percoco
>
-- 
*Telles Nobrega*
Software Engineer @ Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20151207/c9ffdc12/attachment.html>