Open Stack

Not opposed to splitting like this.  I know our other big agenda item is around cells, so maybe we could do a 1/3 split for each topic (still keeping Neutron first.)

Plus we’ve got the lunch time immediately before, so we could use that time for something.

Matt VW, any thoughts?


From: Ryan Moats
Date: Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 2:35 PM
To: Geoff Arnold
Cc: "mordred at inaugust.com<mailto:mordred at inaugust.com>", OpenStack Operators
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for PAO Ops Meetup (August18, 19)


The network discussion was going to be the first item for that breakout, so I think that might be possible (Mike, what say you?)

Ryan Moats

Geoff Arnold <geoff at geoffarnold.com<mailto:geoff at geoffarnold.com>> wrote on 08/06/2015 03:32:19 PM:

> From: Geoff Arnold <geoff at geoffarnold.com<mailto:geoff at geoffarnold.com>>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM at IBMUS
> Cc: mordred at inaugust.com<mailto:mordred at inaugust.com>, openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>,
> Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org<mailto:tom at openstack.org>>
> Date: 08/06/2015 03:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for PAO Ops Meetup
> (August18, 19)
>
> I was afraid of that.
> We’ve got 90 minutes for the breakout sessions - can we treat Large
> Scale and Public as a single session, and divide it 45-45 or 60-30?
>
> Geoff
>
> On Aug 6, 2015, at 12:51 PM, Ryan Moats <rmoats at us.ibm.com<mailto:rmoats at us.ibm.com>> wrote:
>
> Part of the LDT is discussing networking issues with Neutron folks
> that will not be in the room, so moving it would require re-
> synchronizing schedules. I'd rather avoid that if possible...
>
> Ryan Moats
>
> Geoff Arnold <geoff at geoffarnold.com<mailto:geoff at geoffarnold.com>> wrote on 08/06/2015 12:37:49 PM:
>
> > From: Geoff Arnold <geoff at geoffarnold.com<mailto:geoff at geoffarnold.com>>
> > To: Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org<mailto:tom at openstack.org>>, mordred at inaugust.com<mailto:mordred at inaugust.com>
> > Cc: openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
> > Date: 08/06/2015 12:38 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for PAO Ops Meetup
> > (August 18, 19)
> >
> > Well, I’d prefer not to put Public Clouds into the existing HPC
> > slot, because I’m involved in the Product WG discussion that’s
> > scheduled at the same time.
> >
> > Could we put Public Clouds in the Tuesday breakout mix, and Large
> > Deployments in the Wednesday breakout (replacing the HPC WG).
> >
> > Geoff
> >
> > PS Will you be there, Monty? Any preferences?
> >
> >
> > > On Aug 5, 2015, at 7:31 PM, Tom Fifield <tom at openstack.org<mailto:tom at openstack.org>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Geoff.
> > >
> > > Which session would you propose to replace?
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > >
> > > Tom
> > >
> > > On 06/08/15 03:14, Geoff Arnold wrote:
> > >> I’d like to see some time spent on specific issues associated with
> > >> public cloud operations.  (This is not the same as Large Deployments.)
> > >> As Stefano pointed out yesterday:
> > >>
> > >> http://maffulli.net/2015/08/04/a-new-push-for-openstack-public-clouds/
> > >>
> > >> this is an area which probably needs more attention.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >>
> > >> Geoff

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150806/370659dd/attachment.html>