Open Stack

I've got to agree. We don't really use the included VPNaaS for many of the
reasons listed below. Most of our users put appliance VM to establish
tunnels and behave as their subnet's router, same as Sam.

On 8/6/15, 7:52 AM, "Sam Stoelinga" <sammiestoel at gmail.com> wrote:

>I'm running VPN servers in VMs. Neutron VPNaaS only supports site-to-site
>IPSec based VPNs and it seemed quite troublesome to setup (opinion-based).
>
>
>Sam Stoelinga
>
>
>On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Edgar Magana
><edgar.magana at workday.com> wrote:
>
>I know I can¹t wear both hats but in this case as Operator as one of the
>constant moderators for the neutron-related sessions, I can say that I
>have never received a report about the VPNaaS code from the Operators.
>This could be means two things, the code
> is terrific and nobody has issues with it or basically nobody uses it.
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>
>Edgar
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>From: Kyle Mestery
>Date: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 12:56 PM
>To: "openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org"
>Cc: Paul Michali, Doug Wiegley
>Subject: [Openstack-operators] [neutron] Any users of Neutron's VPN
>advanced service?
>
>
>
>Operators:
>
>
>We (myself, Paul and Doug) are looking to better understand who might be
>using Neutron's VPNaaS code. We're looking for what version you're using,
>how long you're using it, and if you plan to continue deploying it with
>future upgrades. Any information operators
> can provide here would be fantastic!
>
>
>Thank you!
>
>Kyle
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-operators mailing list
>OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
>
>
>
>