Open Stack

Cool trick. :) I think I got it all but please do double-check:
https://review.openstack.org/121426

The upstream this will pull from is https://github.com/annegentle/ha-guide

Thanks,

Anne

On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse.com> wrote:

> On 09/14/2014 09:25 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > On 09/14/2014 08:16 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Edgar Magana <edgar.magana at workday.com
> >> <mailto:edgar.magana at workday.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>     Can you guys include me in any further discussions?
> >>     I want to help..
> >>
> >>     Thanks,
> >>
> >>     Edgar
> >>
> >>     From: Adam Lawson <alawson at aqorn.com <mailto:alawson at aqorn.com>>
> >>     Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 at 11:48 AM
> >>     To: Anne Gentle <anne at openstack.org <mailto:anne at openstack.org>>
> >>     Cc: David Medberry <david.medberry at canonical.com
> >>     <mailto:david.medberry at canonical.com>>, Sriram Subramanian
> >>     <sriram at sriramhere.com <mailto:sriram at sriramhere.com>>,
> >>     "openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> >>     <mailto:openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org>"
> >>     <openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org
> >>     <mailto:openstack-docs at lists.openstack.org>>,
> >>     "openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> >>     <mailto:openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>"
> >>     <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> >>     <mailto:openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>>
> >>     Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] High Availability Guide team
> >>
> >>     I'd be happy to participate as needed Anne.
> >>
> >>     On Aug 26, 2014 11:10 AM, "Anne Gentle" <anne at openstack.org
> >>     <mailto:anne at openstack.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >>         Hi all,
> >>         Cross-posting to -docs and -operators.
> >>
> >>         At the Ops mid-cycle meetup this week, Matt Griffin, David
> >>         Medberry, and Sriram Subramanian offered to start a review team
> >>         for the High Availability Guide. It needs some updates and it's
> >>         best if the review team works similar to the Security Guide --
> >>         subject matter experts working with core docs team members for
> >>         reviews. So I'm proposing we pull it into its own repo just like
> >>         the Security Guide. Any reasons not to? I think the next steps
> are:
> >>
> >>         1. Propose a patch to openstack/governance to show the repo is
> >>         governed by the Docs program.
> >>         2. Propose a patch that sets up a separate review team starting
> >>         with Matt, David, and Sriram. We think Emilien would be
> >>         interested too, sound good? Any others? We can have members of
> >>         openstack-docs-core as well, similar to the Security Guide.
> >>         3. Propose a patch that gets that guide building separately in a
> >>         different repo.
> >>         4.  Start working on the four bugs already logged [1] and logged
> >>         more as needed.
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >> Sounds like we still need the tasks above to happen.
> >>
> >> Sriram and Andreas, I've got a branch with the HA Guide separated out
> >> at https://github.com/annegentle/ha-guide -- can you take a look and
> see
> >> if we can use it for the starting point? If it's good-to-go, I can take
> >> tasks 1 and 3. (Sriram, I hope you didn't get too far with the separate
> >> repo, holler if you want to divvy up either of those.)
> >
> > That is as simple import without all the history and seems to have one
> > level too much.
> >
> > I propose to do use git filter-branch to keep the history intact,
>
> Have a look at:
>
> https://github.com/ajaeger/ha-guide/tree/master/doc
>
> This one misses the top-level files that were in your directory but I
> can add them back later on.
>
> Sriram, do you have the perfect solution? ;)
>
> Andreas
> --
>  Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
>   SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>    GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
>     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20140914/8161295e/attachment.html>