Open Stack

I think an ops PTL would require a clear set of tasks that an ops
program was working on. We have examples of largely codeless programs
now (release management, security) but its still important that the
program have a set of shared goals.

You can see the requirements for a new program here:

http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/new-programs-requirements

Cheers,
Michael

On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:44 AM, John Dewey <john at dewey.ws> wrote:
> As all the current projects are having PTL elections, I thought I would
> throw this out there.
> Would it make sense to have an ops PTL?  I could see this being useful in
> some ways,
> and not in others.  Maybe something to discuss at the un-conference.
>
> John
>
> On Friday, March 28, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I had a bit of a play around, combining some similar things from the
> suggestions, and was able to come up with something that I think covers
> everything that was suggested. If it's way off - no problems, we can go
> to a vote or similar.
>
> Also had a go at selecting moderators for sessions based on our
> volunteers - feel free to strike yourself out or move around.
>
> All of this is up for discussion and change, so read below and head on
> over to the etherpad, or post a reply email :)
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ATL-ops-unconference-RFC
>
>
> Monday
> 0700 - 1115 Registration, Keynotes, Break
> 1115 - 1155 Ask the devs: Meet the PTLs and TC, How to get the best
> out of the design summit
> 1205 - 1245 Reasonable Defaults
>
> 1400 - 1440 Upgrades and Deployment Approaches
> 1450 - 1530 Architecture Show and Tell, Tales and Fails
> 1540 - 1620 Architecture Show and Tell, Tales and Fails
>
> 1730 - 1810 Security (MODERATOR NEEDED)
>
> Schedule: Friday
> 9:00 - 9:40 Enterprise Gaps
> 9:50 - 10:30 Database
>
> 10:50 - 11:30 Issues at Scale
> 11:40 - 12:20 Monitoring and Logging
>
> 1:20 - 2:00 Ansible (MODERATOR NEEDED)
> 2:10 - 2:50 Chef
> 3:00 - 3:40 Puppet
>
> 4:00 - 4:40 Networking
> 4:50 - 5:30 Best discovery of the week, Meta Discussion - ops
> communication and governance
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Tom
>
> On 27/03/14 11:20, Tom Fifield wrote:
>
> All,
>
> The idea for this "Operators Summit" has received excellent support, and
> we have more than twenty session ideas proposed in the etherpad:
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ATL-ops-unconference-RFC
>
> We've blocked out a room on Monday to host it.
>
> What we need now is:
> 1) Find moderators for the sessions
> 2) Select which sessions are going to happen
> 3) For the architecture show-and-tell, we probably need to select who
> will present in this.
>
> If you can help with any of this, please do get in touch, or get your
> name down on the etherpad. I'll be in contact soon.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Tom
>
> On 17/03/14 07:54, Tom Fifield wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Would you like more time at the summit to talk OpenStack ops? Read on!
>
> Of course, we will have a dedicated Operations track in the conference -
> and it's going to be better than ever this year, with an all-new
> selection group ... all of whom actually run clouds.
>
>
> However, we've never really had many design-summit style
> feedback/sharing sessons for ops. Let's change that.
>
>
> Would you find it useful to have a space to share architectures, best
> practices, and give feedback on the bits of OpenStack that are giving
> you pain? Or perhaps find out how to get more involved in the Open
> Design process? Help us justify locking away a few rooms :)
>
>
> Just to start the discussion, I have written up a straw man proposal/RFC
> of one potential use of the time. It's specifically designed to be
> ripped to shreds - so please do!
>
> The idea is to have something that's more like a design summit feel -
> people sitting in a room discussing things, as opposed to more
> presentations.
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ATL-ops-unconference-RFC
>
>
> So, what would you like to see?
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Tom
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>



-- 
Rackspace Australia