Open Stack

While you're at it, you can also get a benefit from using ceph for glance.

On Thursday, March 20, 2014, gustavo panizzo <gfa> <gfa at zumbi.com.ar> wrote:

> use ceph as backend for cinder, it works fine :) doc is on inktank website
>
> i use cephfs for other stuff but i found it slow (fuse is to blame)
> --
> 1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333
>
> sent from mobile
>
> On March 20, 2014 9:24:08 AM GMT-03:00, Zeeshan Ali Shah <zashah at kth.se<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','zashah at kth.se');>>
> wrote:
>>
>> HI,
>>
>> We are running ceph for S3 and Swift .
>>
>> For Cinder I was also thinking to use the ceph . Now there are few
>> options .
>>
>> 1. Should we totally drop cinder and use ceph rbd totally ? does ceph rbd
>> integrate good with OS keystone and horizon
>> 2. Can we some how connect cinder backend to use rbd ?
>> 3. What if we use cephFS as backend for cinder , any performance issues ?
>>
>>
>> any suggestion ?
>> --
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Zeeshan Ali Shah
>> System Administrator - PDC HPC
>> PhD researcher (IT security)
>> Kungliga Tekniska Hogskolan
>> +46 8 790 9115
>> http://www.pdc.kth.se/members/zashah
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org');>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20140320/6edb6ff9/attachment.html>