[Openstack-operators] Cinder with Ceph which option is good ?

gustavo panizzo <gfa> gfa at zumbi.com.ar
Thu Mar 20 14:18:21 UTC 2014


use ceph as backend for cinder, it works fine :) doc is on inktank website

i use cephfs for other stuff but i found it slow (fuse is to blame)
--
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

sent from mobile

On March 20, 2014 9:24:08 AM GMT-03:00, Zeeshan Ali Shah <zashah at kth.se> wrote:
>HI,
>
>We are running ceph for S3 and Swift .
>
>For Cinder I was also thinking to use the ceph . Now there are few
>options
>.
>
>1. Should we totally drop cinder and use ceph rbd totally ? does ceph
>rbd
>integrate good with OS keystone and horizon
>2. Can we some how connect cinder backend to use rbd ?
>3. What if we use cephFS as backend for cinder , any performance issues
>?
>
>
>any suggestion ?
>-- 
>
>Regards
>
>Zeeshan Ali Shah
>System Administrator - PDC HPC
>PhD researcher (IT security)
>Kungliga Tekniska Hogskolan
>+46 8 790 9115
>http://www.pdc.kth.se/members/zashah
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-operators mailing list
>OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20140320/f98942ec/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-operators mailing list