Open Stack

Hi,

Can you pls update - what exact issues you had with cells+HARabbitMQ?

Thanks,
NM
-- 
Nick Maslov
Sent with Airmail

On January 31, 2014 at 8:02:43 AM, Matt Van Winkle (mvanwink at rackspace.com) wrote:

Also, last time we checked, if you are using cells, then it doesn't play nice with H/A Rabbit.  I could have missed that update that has fixed this, but it's something to keep in mind if you are using them or plan to in the future as you scale.

Matt

From: Abel Lopez <alopgeek at gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, January 30, 2014 11:47 PM
To: "Allamaraju, Subbu" <subbu at subbu.org>
Cc: "openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org" <openstack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] RabbitMQ HA

My personal experience is that rabbit HA cluster seems to eat itself every couple of weeks. It's pretty harsh, have to kill all cluster nodes, blow away mnesia, then it'll come back. 

On Sunday, January 19, 2014, Allamaraju, Subbu <subbu at subbu.org> wrote:
OpenStack HA guide (http://docs.openstack.org/high-availability-guide/content/s-rabbitmq.html) says that Pacemaker/DRBD approach is preferred over active-active mirrored queues. Details are sparse in the guide. Is anyone aware of any data/issues first hand?

Thanks for any pointers.

Subbu
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
_______________________________________________  
OpenStack-operators mailing list  
OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org  
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20140131/dc6597a1/attachment.html>