Open Stack

And network node goes to...? I mean, you suggest to use one compute as 
network node? IMHO it gonna be really unbalanced. And 
neutron-on-the-every-compute (DVVR) is tech. preview yet...

On 12/21/2014 01:09 AM, matt wrote:
> the only issue with nova-network here is that it's FINALLY slated to 
> be removed in the next release.
>
> so yes it will work, and it may even be optimal for this size 
> deployment, but it will NOT be at all future proofed.
>
> I'd go with neutron as of now.
>
> -matt
>
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 5:16 PM, George Shuklin 
> <george.shuklin at gmail.com <mailto:george.shuklin at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hello.
>
>     I've suddenly got request for small installation of openstack
>     (about 3-5 computes).
>
>     They need almost nothing (just a management panel to span simple
>     instances, few friendly tennants), and I curious, is nova-network
>     good solution for this? They don't want network node and do
>     'network node on compute' is kinda sad.
>
>     (And one more: did anyone tried to put management stuff on compute
>     node in mild production?)
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     OpenStack-operators mailing list
>     OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20141221/ffbbac95/attachment.html>