Open Stack

Good to know, that what I thought as well
thanks for the insight.
thanks Jabob as well, curious too see what your tests will bring up :)

Razique Mahroua - Nuage & Co
razique.mahroua at gmail.com
Tel : +33 9 72 37 94 15



Le 25 juil. 2013 à 12:35, Sylvain Bauza <sylvain.bauza at bull.net> a écrit :

> Le 25/07/2013 11:34, Razique Mahroua a écrit :
>> 
>> - How come I never had such issues (to validate) with MooseFS while it's the mfsmount is FUSE-based?
> 
> I'm not saying FUSE is killing perfs :-) My point was more likely : be careful, if you mix up GlusterFS + Windows (caching system on C:) + FUSE, then you *could* have something like race condition which could affect perfs.
> 
> I haven't tested out MFS, happy if this is not reproducing, then :-)
> 
>> - Does that mean the issue is not si much about Gluster, rather all FUSE-based FS?
>> 
> 
> Indeed. As said though, CephFS is also not perfect. If people want to choose Ceph, then it's better to boot from volume with Cinder-based RBD (RADOS Block Device) driver.
> 
> -Sylvain

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20130725/d19b368b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NUAGECO-LOGO-Fblan_petit.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 10122 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20130725/d19b368b/attachment.jpg>