What do people use for cinder? Thanks Paras. On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Razique Mahroua <razique.mahroua at gmail.com>wrote: > I was about to use CephFS (Bobtail) but the I can't resize the instances > without having CephFS crashing. > I'm currently considering GlusterFS which not only provides great > performance, it's also pretty much easy to administer :) > > Le 17 avr. 2013 à 22:07, JuanFra Rodriguez Cardoso < > juanfra.rodriguez.cardoso at gmail.com> a écrit : > > Glance and Nova with MooseFS. > Reliable, good performance and easy configuration. > > --- > JuanFra > > > 2013/4/17 Jacob Godin <jacobgodin at gmail.com> > >> Hi all, >> >> Just a quick survey for all of you running distributed file systems for >> nova-compute instance storage. What are you running? Why are you using that >> particular file system? >> >> We are currently running CephFS and chose it because we are already using >> Ceph for volume and image storage. It works great, except for snapshotting, >> where we see slow performance and high CPU load. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> >> > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20130417/b392df27/attachment.html>