Hi JuanFra, I tried both GlusterFS and MooseFS, and the answer is...it depends on the kind of data you are going to work with. Both (in fact even Ceph) are pretty easy to manage, performance-wise, here is a good reading http://blog.tinola.com/?e=13 My tests gave me roughly the same conclusions. What would be the network hardware ? Regards, Raz Nuage & Co - Razique Mahroua razique.mahroua at gmail.com Le 21 nov. 2012 à 09:48, JuanFra Rodríguez Cardoso <juanfra.rodriguez.cardoso at gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi everyone: > > I'd like to know your opinion as OpenStack experts: > > Would you recommend CephFS as shared storage in /var/lib/nova/instances? > Another option it would be use GlusterFS or MooseFS for /var/lib/nova/instances directory and Ceph RBD for Glance and Nova volumes, don't you think? > > Thanks for your attention. > > Best regards, > JuanFra > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20121121/f0b9ac1f/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: NUAGECO-LOGO-Fblan_petit.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 10122 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20121121/f0b9ac1f/attachment.jpg>
