Open Stack

Nice!
Thanks guys. thats a plus for us to upgrade, since we have already lots of
users in keystone using swift and dont want to open another ksnt service
and replicate databases and stuff.

best regards !
On 11 Dec 2012 19:43, "Dolph Mathews" <dolph.mathews at gmail.com> wrote:

> +1; if it doesn't work, it's a bug.
>
>
> -Dolph
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Matt Joyce <matt.joyce at cloudscaling.com>wrote:
>
>> My guess would be that it would work.  The keystone API hasn't changed
>> massively between essex and folsom.
>>
>> I have not tested.
>>
>> But I am fairly confident it would work just fine.
>>
>> -Matt
>>
>>  On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Alejandro Comisario <
>> alejandro.comisario at mercadolibre.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  Hi guys, we are planning to upgrade our production cluster from 1.4.8
>>> to 1.7.4 to have the several features of the new version.
>>> One of the main doubts before dive into this task is as follow :
>>>
>>> Is it possible to use SWIFT 1.7.4 with Keystone/ESSEX ? Or is MUST to
>>> have Keystone from Folsom release ?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance !
>>>
>>> *
>>> *
>>> *Alejandrito*
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>>> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> Post to     : openstack at lists.launchpad.net
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20121211/2c1aecfc/attachment.html>