Open Stack

On 2019-12-04 09:45:48 -0500 (-0500), Mohammed Naser wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 5:47 AM Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> wrote:
[...]
> > I'm also wondering if the advisory board should not also include seats
> > for the infrastructure donors... Since we should definitely be making
> > sure Opendev goes in a direction that encourages them to continue
> > investing in (or increase) the resources that they give us.
> 
> I wanted to bring this up but indeed, I think that as an infrastructure
> donor, there is a significant investment from our side and knowing
> where and how that's going is important

Yep, you mentioned it at the PTG and I think it's a great idea. Not
only does it provide a means for technical representatives from our
resource donors to give more direct feedback and even debate topics
between one another, it also gives the OpenDev sysadmins a clearer
point of contact when they need to reach out to those same donors.

Combining with Thierry's idea, perhaps there are two advisory boards
for OpenDev, one for the projects participating in it and one for
the resource donors? Or would they be better combined into a single
advisory board?

And yeah, on the earlier "PTL" point, I agree we could stand to come
up with a better term (service coordinator?).
-- 
Jeremy Stanley
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 963 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/attachments/20191204/5dc3cde3/attachment.sig>