Checking to see when this is going to get tagged? Thanks On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 9:23 AM David van der Bokke <bokke at google.com> wrote: > So it looks like the gerrit team is actually waiting for this to get to > tagged before putting the refs/publish removal into a new release but would > like to do it before the end of the quarter. > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 11:20 AM Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote: > >> On 2018-08-22 10:11:20 -0700 (-0700), David van der Bokke wrote: >> > Thanks Jeremy. I am trying to get an exact date from the Gerrit >> > team, but I can say that tagging/releasing a new git-review is a >> > likely precursor given that the team had actually removed the ref >> > and subsequently reverted the change after discovering that >> > git-review needed an update for it. >> >> Thanks! That definitely helps. When they added it in Gerrit 2.3 >> the release notes[*] indicated refs/for was deprecated, so the >> update proposed to git-review to switch back was really the first >> we'd heard of it being un-deprecated again (I'm not finding a >> similar release note about it, and the ACLs release note in 2.16 >> about refs/for still talks about people using refs/publish too). >> >> [*] >> https://gerrit.googlesource.com/gerrit/+/v2.15.3/ReleaseNotes/ReleaseNotes-2.3.txt#21 >> -- >> Jeremy Stanley >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-Infra mailing list >> OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/attachments/20180919/2f33a3a0/attachment.html>