On November 23, 2017 10:21 am, Jens Harbott wrote: > 2017-11-23 5:28 GMT+00:00 Tristan Cacqueray <tdecacqu at redhat.com>: > ... >> TL;DR; Is it alright if we re-enable this CI and report those tests on >> zuul-jobs patchsets? > > I like the general idea, but please wait for more feedback until doing so. > Thank you for the feedback. I've removed the patchset-created and change-restored trigger event. > Also, IMHO it would be better if you could change the "recheck-sf" > trigger to something that does not also rerun upstream checks. What > seems to work well for other projects is "run ci-name", where ci-name > is the name of the Gerrit account. > Ok, it's now triggering on "run sf-project-io" > It would also be nice to see an entry for your system at > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems > Alright, I've added https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/Software_Factory_CI Regards, -Tristan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/attachments/20171124/59eba770/attachment.sig>